Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9296-9305. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08019-0. Epub 2021 May 26.
MRI quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) using R or R* relaxometry requires offline post-processing causing reporting delays, administrative overhead, and added costs. A prototype 3D multi-gradient-echo pulse sequence, with inline post-processing, allows immediate calculation of LIC from an R* map (inline R*-LIC) without offline processing. We compared inline R*-LIC to FerriScan and offline R* calibration methods.
Forty patients (25 women, 15 men; age 18-82 years), prospectively underwent FerriScan and the prototype sequence, which produces two R* maps, with and without fat modeling, as well as an inline R*-LIC map derived from the R* map with fat modeling, with informed consent. For each map, the following contours were drawn: ROIs, whole-axial-liver contour, and an exact copy of contour utilized by FerriScan. LIC values from the FerriScan report and those calculated using an alternative R calibration were the reference standards. Results were compared using Pearson and interclass correlation coefficients (PCC, ICC), linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and estimation of area under the receiver operator curve (ROC-AUC).
Inline R*-LIC demonstrated good agreement with the reference standards. Compared to FerriScan, inline R*-LIC with whole-axial-liver contour, ROIs, and FerriScan contour demonstrated PCC of 94.8%, 94.8%, and 92%; ICC 93%, 92.7%, and 90.2%; regression slopes 1.004, 0.974, and 1.031; mean bias 5.54%, 10.91%, and 0.36%; and ROC-AUC estimates 0.903, 0.906, and 0.890 respectively. Agreement was maintained when adjusted for sex, age, diagnosis, liver fat content, and fat-water swap.
Inline R*-LIC provides robust and comparable quantification of LIC compared to FerriScan, without the need for offline post-processing.
• In patients being treated for iron overload with chelation therapy, liver iron concentration (LIC) is regularly assessed in order to monitor and adjust therapy. • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to quantify LIC. Several R and R* methods are available, all of which require offline post-processing. • A novel R* MRI method allows for immediate calculation of LIC and provides comparable quantification of LIC to the FerriScan and recently published alternative R* methods.
使用 R 或 R弛豫度定量磁共振成像(MRI)测定肝脏铁浓度(LIC)需要离线后处理,这会导致报告延迟、行政开销增加和成本增加。一种具有在线后处理功能的原型 3D 多梯度回波脉冲序列可立即从 R图(在线 R*-LIC)计算 LIC,无需离线处理。我们比较了在线 R*-LIC 与 FerriScan 和离线 R*校准方法。
40 例患者(25 名女性,15 名男性;年龄 18-82 岁),前瞻性地接受 FerriScan 和原型序列检查,该序列产生两个 R图,一个带有和不带有脂肪建模,以及一个带有脂肪建模的 R图的在线 R*-LIC 图,均获得知情同意。对于每个图谱,均绘制以下轮廓:ROI、全轴肝轮廓和 FerriScan 所用的精确轮廓。FerriScan 报告中的 LIC 值和使用替代 R 校准计算的 LIC 值是参考标准。使用 Pearson 和组内相关系数(PCC、ICC)、线性回归、Bland-Altman 分析和接收者操作特征曲线(ROC-AUC)下面积的估计值进行比较。
在线 R*-LIC 与参考标准具有良好的一致性。与 FerriScan 相比,在线 R*-LIC 与全轴肝轮廓、ROI 和 FerriScan 轮廓的 PCC 分别为 94.8%、94.8%和 92%;ICC 分别为 93%、92.7%和 90.2%;回归斜率分别为 1.004、0.974 和 1.031;平均偏差分别为 5.54%、10.91%和 0.36%;ROC-AUC 估计值分别为 0.903、0.906 和 0.890。当按性别、年龄、诊断、肝脂肪含量和脂肪-水交换进行调整时,结果仍保持一致。
与 FerriScan 相比,在线 R*-LIC 可提供稳健且可比的 LIC 定量,而无需离线后处理。
在接受螯合治疗治疗铁过载的患者中,为了监测和调整治疗,定期评估肝脏铁浓度(LIC)。
磁共振成像(MRI)常用于定量 LIC。有几种 R 和 R*方法可用,都需要离线后处理。
一种新型 RMRI 方法可立即计算 LIC,并可提供与 FerriScan 和最近发表的替代 R方法相当的 LIC 定量。