Suppr超能文献

认证助产士作为家庭医学住院医师的教师。

Certified Nurse Midwives as Teachers of Family Medicine Residents.

作者信息

Farahi Narges, Neylan Elizabeth, Silbersack Johanna, Oat-Judge Julia, Sloane Philip D

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2020 Feb;52(2):97-103. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2020.548818.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The high quality of obstetric care provided by certified nurse midwives (CNMs) has led some to hypothesize that collaboration with CNMs may encourage more family medicine (FM) residents to subsequently practice maternity care. Our goal was to understand the current state of CNM involvement in FM resident education.

METHODS

We conducted two surveys: one to a random sample of 180 FM program directors, and one to 147 CNMs involved in medical education. The surveys examined the nature, prevalence, and attitudes regarding CNM involvement in FM residency training.

RESULTS

The surveys' response rate was 59% from FM program directors and 58% from CNMs. Thirty-six percent of FM directors reported no CNM involvement in their residency programs, 26% reported minimal interaction, and only 6% reported a fully integrated model with CNMs on faculty. Eighty-eight percent of CNMs and 64% of program directors reported a prefence for increased interaction. Programs with highly involved CNMs reported 33% of graduates subsequently practicing prenatal care, with only 13% of graduates practicing in programs with low CNM involvement (P<.003). However, there was no difference in those providing inpatient maternity care. Thirty-one percent of FM program directors and 25% of CNMs felt that physicians and CNMs have different ideas about how to treat patients; 26% of FM program directors who worked with midwives felt that CNMs should not be involved in residency curriculum planning.

CONCLUSIONS

CNM participation in FM residency education is very limited. Our study identified a gap between the current state and the preferences of CNMs and FM program directors for greater educational collaboration. Residency program director attitudes may contribute to the low rate of collaboration between the two fields.

摘要

背景与目的

认证助产士(CNMs)提供的高质量产科护理使得一些人推测,与认证助产士合作可能会鼓励更多家庭医学(FM)住院医师随后从事产科护理工作。我们的目标是了解认证助产士参与家庭医学住院医师教育的现状。

方法

我们进行了两项调查:一项针对180名家庭医学项目主任的随机样本,另一项针对参与医学教育的147名认证助产士。这些调查考察了认证助产士参与家庭医学住院医师培训的性质、普遍性和态度。

结果

家庭医学项目主任的调查回复率为59%,认证助产士的回复率为58%。36%的家庭医学主任报告称认证助产士未参与其住院医师项目,26%报告互动极少,只有6%报告有认证助产士作为教员的完全整合模式。88%的认证助产士和64%的项目主任表示倾向于增加互动。认证助产士高度参与的项目报告称,33%的毕业生随后从事产前护理工作,而认证助产士参与度低的项目中只有13%的毕业生从事此项工作(P<0.003)。然而,在提供住院产科护理方面没有差异。31%的家庭医学项目主任和25%的认证助产士认为医生和认证助产士在如何治疗患者方面有不同想法;与助产士合作的家庭医学项目主任中有26%认为认证助产士不应参与住院医师课程规划。

结论

认证助产士参与家庭医学住院医师教育非常有限。我们的研究发现了当前现状与认证助产士和家庭医学项目主任对加强教育合作的偏好之间的差距。住院医师项目主任的态度可能导致这两个领域的低合作率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验