Bensmann Wiebke, Zink Nicolas, Werner Annett, Beste Christian, Stock Ann-Kathrin
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Institute and Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 10;9(2):481. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020481.
Alcohol increases GABAergic signaling and decreases glutamatergic signaling in the brain. Variations in these neurotransmitter levels may modulate/predict executive functioning. Matching this, strong impairments of response inhibition are one of the most consistently reported cognitive/behavioral effects of acute alcohol intoxication. However, it has never been investigated whether baseline differences in these neurotransmitters allow to predict how much alcohol intoxication impairs response inhibition, and whether this is reflected in neurophysiological measures of cognitive control. We used MR spectroscopy to assess baseline (i.e., sober) GABA and glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and striatum in = 30 healthy young males, who were subsequently tested once sober and once intoxicated (1.01 permille). Inhibition was assessed with the sustained attention to response task (SART). This paradigm also allows to examine the effect of different degrees of response automatization, which is a known modulator for response inhibition, but does not seem to be substantially impaired during acute intoxication. As a neurophysiological correlate of response inhibition and control, we quantified EEG-derived theta band power and located its source using beamforming analyses. We found that alcohol-induced response inhibition deficits only occurred in the case of response automatization. This was reflected by decreased theta band activity in the left supplementary motor area (SMA), which may reflect modulations in the encoding of a surprise signal in response to inhibition cues. However, we did not find that differences in baseline (i.e., sober) GABA or glutamate levels significantly modulated differences in the size of alcohol-induced inhibition deficits.
酒精会增强大脑中的γ-氨基丁酸能信号传导并减弱谷氨酸能信号传导。这些神经递质水平的变化可能会调节/预测执行功能。与此相符的是,反应抑制的严重受损是急性酒精中毒最常被报道的认知/行为效应之一。然而,从未有人研究过这些神经递质的基线差异是否能够预测酒精中毒对反应抑制的损害程度,以及这是否反映在认知控制的神经生理学测量中。我们使用磁共振波谱来评估30名健康年轻男性前扣带回皮质(ACC)和纹状体中的基线(即清醒时)γ-氨基丁酸和谷氨酸水平,随后这些男性分别在清醒和醉酒(血液酒精浓度为1.01‰)状态下接受了一次测试。使用持续注意力反应任务(SART)来评估抑制能力。该范式还可以研究不同程度的反应自动化的影响,反应自动化是反应抑制的一个已知调节因素,但在急性中毒期间似乎并未受到实质性损害。作为反应抑制和控制的神经生理学相关指标,我们对脑电图衍生的θ波段功率进行了量化,并使用波束形成分析来确定其来源。我们发现,酒精引起的反应抑制缺陷仅在反应自动化的情况下出现。这表现为左侧辅助运动区(SMA)的θ波段活动减少,这可能反映了对抑制线索的意外信号编码中的调节。然而,我们没有发现基线(即清醒时)γ-氨基丁酸或谷氨酸水平的差异显著调节酒精引起的抑制缺陷大小的差异。