Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, MS Centre Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Apr;224(3):1291-1300. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01839-3. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
Medial and superior frontal theta oscillations are important for response inhibition. The norepinephrine (NE) system has been shown to modulate these oscillations possibly via gain control mechanisms, which depend on the modulation of neuron membrane potentials. Because the latter are also modulated by tDCS, the interrelation of tDCS and NE effects on superior frontal theta band activity needs investigation. We test the hypothesis that anodal tDCS affects modulatory effects of the NE system on theta band activity during inhibitory control in superior frontal regions. Using EEG beamforming, theta band activity in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) was integrated (correlated) with the pupil diameter data as an indirect index of NE activity. In a within-subject design, healthy participants completed a response inhibition task in two sessions in which they received 2 mA anodal tDCS over the vertex, or sham stimulation. There were no behavioral effects of anodal tDCS. Yet, tDCS affected correlations between SFG theta band activity time course and the pupil diameter time course. Correlations were evident after sham stimulation (r = .701; p < .004), but absent after anodal tDCS. The observed power of this dissociation was above 95%. The data suggest that anodal tDCS may eliminate neuromodulatory effects, likely of the NE system, on theta band activity during response inhibition in a structure of the response inhibition network. The NE system and tDCS seem to target similar mechanisms important for cognitive control in the prefrontal cortex. The results provide a hint why tDCS often fails to induce overt behavioral effects and shows that neurobiological systems, which may exert similar effects as tDCS on neural processes should closely be monitored in tDCS experiments.
额极和额上θ 振荡对反应抑制很重要。去甲肾上腺素(NE)系统被证明可以通过增益控制机制调节这些振荡,而这些机制取决于神经元膜电位的调节。由于后者也受到 tDCS 的调节,因此需要研究 tDCS 和 NE 对额上θ 波段活动的相互影响。我们假设阳极 tDCS 会影响 NE 系统对额上区域抑制性控制期间θ 波段活动的调节作用。使用 EEG 波束形成,额上回(SFG)的θ 波段活动与瞳孔直径数据相关联(相关),作为 NE 活动的间接指标。在一项被试内设计中,健康参与者在两次会议中完成了反应抑制任务,在两次会议中他们都接受了顶点 2 mA 的阳极 tDCS 或假刺激。阳极 tDCS 没有行为影响。然而,tDCS 影响了 SFG θ 波段活动时间过程与瞳孔直径时间过程之间的相关性。在假刺激后存在相关性(r=.701;p<.004),但在阳极 tDCS 后不存在相关性。这种分离的观察到的功率超过 95%。数据表明,阳极 tDCS 可能会消除 NE 系统对反应抑制期间θ 波段活动的神经调节作用,这种作用可能发生在反应抑制网络的结构中。NE 系统和 tDCS 似乎针对前额叶皮层中对认知控制很重要的类似机制。结果提供了一个提示,为什么 tDCS 经常无法引起明显的行为效应,并表明可能对神经过程产生与 tDCS 相似作用的神经生物学系统应在 tDCS 实验中密切监测。