• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无行为能力,不可修复,且危险。

Incompetent to Stand Trial, Not Restorable, and Dangerous.

机构信息

Dr. Bloom is Clinical Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ. Dr. Kirkorsky is Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Banner University Hospital, Phoenix, AZ.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Jun;48(2):237-243. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003920-20. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

DOI:10.29158/JAAPL.003920-20
PMID:32051203
Abstract

This article focuses on the preferred disposition for an individual charged with a serious crime against another person, adjudicated incompetent to stand trial and not restorable to competence, whose original criminal charges are dismissed without prejudice, and who is regarded by the state as dangerous to the general public. Three current models used today in California, Oregon, and Ohio are described. All three rely on modifications of various aspects of civil commitment law. We then propose a fourth model based on a modified version of the 1989 American Bar Association (ABA) Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards, in which individuals who are found incompetent to stand trial and not restorable to competence and are considered dangerous would be committed under the same special procedures governing the management and treatment of insanity acquittees.

摘要

本文主要探讨了对被控严重人身犯罪、被判定无能力接受审判且无法恢复能力、原刑事指控被无偏见驳回、且被国家视为对公众具有危险的个人的首选处置方式。文中描述了加利福尼亚州、俄勒冈州和俄亥俄州目前使用的三种模式。这三种模式都依赖于对民事拘留法律的各个方面进行修改。然后,我们提出了第四个模式,该模式基于对 1989 年美国律师协会(ABA)刑事司法心理健康标准的修改版本,其中被判定无能力接受审判且无法恢复能力且被认为具有危险的个人将根据管理和治疗精神错乱者的相同特别程序进行拘留。

相似文献

1
Incompetent to Stand Trial, Not Restorable, and Dangerous.无行为能力,不可修复,且危险。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Jun;48(2):237-243. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003920-20. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.审判权利与精神药物:反对在审判期间对被告进行非自愿药物治疗的案例。
Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2002;55(1):165-218.
3
Acquittal by Reason of Insanity Is a Positive Outcome for Defendants Who Cannot Be Restored.因精神错乱而被判无罪对无法康复的被告来说是一个积极的结果。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Jun;48(2):244-250. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.200002-20. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
4
Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law.以色列法律中的民事拘押与刑事精神错乱抗辩
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Aug-Sep;31(4):308-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.11.012. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.犯罪性疯狂:文化意象与精神错乱
Stanford Law Rev. 2009 Apr;61(6):1375-428.
6
Dangerous mentally disordered criminals: unresolvable societal fear?危险的精神错乱罪犯:无法消除的社会恐惧?
J Forensic Sci. 1991 Jan;36(1):210-8.
7
The hidden effects of Montana's "abolition" of the insanity defense.蒙大拿州“废除”精神错乱辩护的潜在影响。
Psychiatr Q. 1995 Summer;66(2):103-17. doi: 10.1007/BF02238858.
8
Interface between the Criminal Justice System and the Mental Health System in Canada.加拿大刑事司法系统与心理健康系统之间的接口。
Psychiatr J Univ Ott. 1985 Mar;10(1):24-33.
9
Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.超越能力与理智:审前评估对案件处理的影响。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(3):379-88.
10
Ending Disparities and Achieving Justice for Individuals with Mental Disabilities.消除精神残疾者的差异并实现公平正义。
Albany Law Rev. 2017;80(3):1037-101.