Department of Interventional Ultrasound, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 12;10(1):2473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59286-8.
Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) mimics liver cirrhosis in many aspects, and no efficient imaging method to differentiate the two diseases has been reported to date. In this study, the imaging and pathological characteristics were analysed for both IPH and cirrhosis. From January 2015 to March 2019, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and pathological results from 16 IPH and 16 liver cirrhosis patients, as well as imaging results of 16 normal patients as a control group, were retrospectively reviewed. The age of the patients was 39 ± 20 years. There was a significant difference in the mean lumen diameter, wall thickness and ratio of thickness to diameter between the IPH and liver cirrhosis patients in the main and sagittal portal veins (P < 0.05), as well as in the lumen diameter and ratio of thickness to diameter between the IPH and liver cirrhosis patients in the Segment 3 (S3) portal vein (P < 0.05). In IPH patients, the main imaging changes were portal vein wall thickening, stenosis or occlusion, a low enhancement area along the portal vein in the delay phase in contrast-enhanced imaging, and a non-homogeneous change in T1WI. The corresponding pathological changes included interlobular vein thickening, stenosis, occlusion, portal area fibrosis, and atrophy or apoptosis of hepatocytes. The main imaging characteristic of liver cirrhosis was a nodular change in T1WI, and the related pathological change was pseudolobule formation. The imaging characteristics of IPH include thickening of the portal vein vascular wall, stenosis of the portal vein lumen and the absence of diffuse cirrhosis-like nodules. These imaging features have a definite pathological basis and could help make differential diagnoses between IPH and cirrhosis.
特发性门静脉高压(IPH)在许多方面模仿肝硬化,迄今为止尚无有效的影像学方法将两者区分开来。本研究分析了 IPH 和肝硬化的影像学和病理学特征。回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月 16 例 IPH 和 16 例肝硬化患者的超声、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)图像及病理学结果,以及 16 例正常患者的影像学结果作为对照组。患者年龄为 39±20 岁。在主门静脉和矢状门静脉的门静脉管腔直径、壁厚度和厚度与直径比方面,IPH 和肝硬化患者之间存在显著差异(P<0.05),在 S3 门静脉的门静脉管腔直径和厚度与直径比方面,IPH 和肝硬化患者之间也存在显著差异(P<0.05)。在 IPH 患者中,主要的影像学改变为门静脉壁增厚、狭窄或闭塞,对比增强成像延迟期门静脉沿门静脉的低增强区,以及 T1WI 不均匀变化。相应的病理学改变包括小叶间静脉增厚、狭窄、闭塞、门区纤维化和肝细胞萎缩或凋亡。肝硬化的主要影像学特征是 T1WI 的结节性改变,相关的病理学改变是假小叶形成。IPH 的影像学特征包括门静脉血管壁增厚、门静脉管腔狭窄和无弥漫性类似肝硬化的结节。这些影像学特征具有明确的病理学基础,可以帮助鉴别 IPH 和肝硬化。