Barakat Monique T, Girotra Mohit, Huang Robert J, Choudhary Abhishek, Thosani Nirav C, Kothari Shivangi, Sethi Saurabh, Banerjee Subhas
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC 5244, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Mar;66(3):866-872. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06124-6. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
Biliary cannulation is readily achieved in > 85% of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). When standard cannulation techniques fail, salvage techniques utilized include the needle knife precut, double wire technique, and Goff septotomy.
Records of patients undergoing ERCP from 2005 to 2016 were retrospectively examined using a prospectively maintained endoscopy database. Patients requiring salvage techniques for biliary access were analyzed together with a control sample of 20 randomly selected index ERCPs per study year. Demographic and clinical variables including indications for ERCP, cannulation rates, and adverse events were collected.
A total of 7984 patients underwent ERCP from 2005 to 2016. Biliary cannulation was successful in 94.9% of control index ERCPs, 87.2% of patients who underwent Goff septotomy (significantly higher than for all other salvage techniques, p ≤ 0.001), 74.5% of patients in the double wire group and 69.6% of patients in the needle knife precut group. Adverse event rates were similar in the Goff septotomy (4.1%) and index ERCP control sample (2.7%) groups. Adverse events were significantly higher in the needle knife group (27.2%) compared with all other groups.
This study represents the largest study to date of Goff septotomy as a salvage biliary access technique. It confirms the efficacy of Goff septotomy and indicates a safety profile similar to standard cannulation techniques and superior to the widely employed needle knife precut sphincterotomy. Our safety and efficacy data suggest that Goff septotomy should be considered as the primary salvage approach for failed cannulation, with needle knife sphincterotomy restricted to Goff septotomy failures.
在接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的患者中,超过85%能够顺利完成胆管插管。当标准插管技术失败时,采用的补救技术包括针刀预切开、双导丝技术和戈夫隔膜切开术。
使用前瞻性维护的内镜数据库对2005年至2016年接受ERCP的患者记录进行回顾性检查。将需要采用补救技术进行胆管通路建立的患者与每个研究年度随机选择的20例初次ERCP对照样本一起进行分析。收集人口统计学和临床变量,包括ERCP的适应证、插管率和不良事件。
2005年至2016年共有7984例患者接受了ERCP。在对照初次ERCP中,胆管插管成功率为94.9%;在接受戈夫隔膜切开术的患者中,成功率为87.2%(显著高于所有其他补救技术,p≤0.001);双导丝组患者成功率为74.5%,针刀预切开组患者成功率为69.6%。戈夫隔膜切开术组(4.1%)和初次ERCP对照样本组(2.7%)的不良事件发生率相似。与所有其他组相比,针刀组的不良事件发生率显著更高(27.2%)。
本研究是迄今为止关于戈夫隔膜切开术作为一种补救性胆管通路技术的最大规模研究。它证实了戈夫隔膜切开术的有效性,并表明其安全性与标准插管技术相似,且优于广泛应用的针刀预切开括约肌切开术。我们的安全性和有效性数据表明,戈夫隔膜切开术应被视为插管失败时的主要补救方法,针刀括约肌切开术仅限于戈夫隔膜切开术失败的情况。