Clemson University, SC, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):NP13121-NP13135. doi: 10.1177/0886260520905544. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
In previous studies, researchers had students rate single nonverbal behaviors as signals conveying and inferring sexual consent. In real-life interactions, young people use an array of behaviors occurring concurrently or successively to interpret sexual consent. With use of a 7-point scale (0 = , 6 = ), students at a southeast public university were asked to rate their perceptions of nine nonverbal behaviors as signals of sexual consent, nine combinations of two of those behaviors, and eight combinations of three behaviors. There were significant effects for both gender and number of behaviors ( < .001). Over 43% of women answered "0" to all behaviors and combinations of behaviors, whereas only 20.3% of men answered "0" to all. The mean ratings for men were greater than those for women under all three conditions and increased with the number of behaviors. At least one third of men responded with "3" (the midpoint of the scale) or greater to seven of the eight combinations of three behaviors, whereas the percentage of women responding "3" or greater never exceeded 18% for any of the individual behaviors or combinations. It is concluded that as the number of nonverbal behaviors increases the subjective interpretation of sexual consent also increases, thus also increasing the chances of unwanted sexual advances.
在先前的研究中，研究人员让学生对单一的非言语行为进行评分，将其视为传达和推断性同意的信号。在现实生活中的互动中，年轻人会使用一系列同时或相继发生的行为来解释性同意。在东南某公立大学，学生们被要求使用 7 分制（0= ，6= ）对 9 种非言语行为作为性同意信号进行评分，对 9 种两两组合的行为和 8 种三三组合的行为进行评分。性别和行为数量都有显著影响（ <.001）。超过 43%的女性对所有行为和行为组合的回答都是“0”，而只有 20.3%的男性对所有行为和行为组合的回答都是“0”。在所有三种情况下，男性的平均评分都高于女性，并且随着行为数量的增加而增加。至少有三分之一的男性对八种三三组合行为中的七种行为的回答是“3”（量表的中点）或更高，而女性对任何一种单一行为或组合行为的回答是“3”或更高的百分比从未超过 18%。结论是，随着非言语行为数量的增加，对性同意的主观解释也会增加，从而也增加了不受欢迎的性侵犯的可能性。
