Associate professor of public health, The University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
Research fellow at the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Dec;49(4):237-244. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12041. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
Affirmative consent standards adopted by colleges and universities are meant to decrease miscommunication that may lead to sexual assault. However, they may not take into account sociocultural factors that influence consent. In particular, the role of gender norms needs to be better understood.
In-depth interviews about college students' sexual activity, including sexual consent communication, were conducted with 17 female and 13 male students at a large southern university during the spring 2013 semester. The interview protocol and analyses were guided by Carspecken's critical qualitative methodology, which seeks to understand both participants' explicit statements and implied underlying meanings and values. Themes and subthemes were identified through inductive analyses.
Two overarching themes emerged: Students perceived a sexual double standard, and males viewed obtaining sex as a conquest. Subthemes related to the first theme reflected endorsement of traditional views of women's sexuality (the notions that "good girls" do not have sex, that women should privilege men's sexual needs over their own and that women "owe" men sex once men have "worked" for it). Subthemes related to the second theme reflected males' beliefs that sex is a commodity that pits women and men against one another, and that women can be "convinced" to have sex if they initially refuse.
College students' consent communication may be influenced by gender norms that challenge assumptions of affirmative consent standards. Cultural shifts in students' views of sexuality may be necessary for affirmative consent policies to be effective.
高校采用肯定性同意标准旨在减少可能导致性侵犯的沟通误解。然而,这些标准可能没有考虑到影响同意的社会文化因素。特别是,需要更好地理解性别规范的作用。
在 2013 年春季学期,在一所大型南方大学,对 17 名女性和 13 名男性学生进行了关于他们的性活动,包括性同意沟通的深入访谈。访谈协议和分析以卡尔斯佩肯的批判性定性方法为指导,该方法旨在理解参与者的明确陈述和隐含的潜在意义和价值观。通过归纳分析确定了主题和子主题。
出现了两个总体主题:学生认为存在性双重标准,男性认为获得性是一种征服。与第一个主题相关的子主题反映了对女性性行为的传统观念的认可(“好女孩”不会发生性行为,女性应该优先考虑男性的性需求而不是自己的需求,以及女性一旦“努力”就应该为男性提供性)。与第二个主题相关的子主题反映了男性的信念,即性是一种将女性和男性对立起来的商品,如果女性最初拒绝,就可以“说服”她们发生性行为。
大学生的同意沟通可能会受到挑战肯定性同意标准的性别规范的影响。学生对性行为的看法的文化转变可能对于肯定性同意政策的有效性是必要的。