• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西安大略肩袖指数丹麦语版本。

The Danish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index.

作者信息

Brix Lone D, Bjørnholdt Karen T, Nikolajsen Lone, Kallestrup Kirsten, Thillemann Theis M

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2020 Feb;67(2).

PMID:32053484
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) into a Danish version (D-WORC) and evaluate its validity, reliability and responsiveness in patients undergoing surgery for arthroscopic subacromial decompression or rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

The original WORC version was cross-culturally adapted into Danish and, the validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness construct validity, internal consistency, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), limits of agreement (LOA) and an anchor minimal important change (MIC) were assessed using the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Short Form-36 and the global rating scale.

RESULTS

The cross-cultural adaption was successful. The correlation was high between the D-WORC and DASH (Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) = 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.79) and moderate between the D-WORC and the OSS (PCC = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55-0.76). Reliability analysis showed an ICC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69-0.87) and an internal consistency of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95). The test-retest mean difference was 76.4 (± standard deviation = 201.40). LOA ranged from -318.3 (95% CI: -387.8--248.9) to 471.2 (95% CI: 401.7-540.6) for the total WORC score. The MIC was -211 in the total score.

CONCLUSIONS

The D-WORC is a valid, reliable and responsive questionnaire that can be used in Danish populations.

FUNDING

Lone Dragnes Brix: Familien Hede Nielsens Fond, Gurli og Hans Engell Friis' Fond, Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond, Knud og Edith Eriksons Mindefond, Region Midtjyllands Sundhedsvidenskabelige Forskningsfond.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Danish Data Protection Agency: 1-16-02-653-15.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在将西方安大略肩袖指数(WORC)进行跨文化改编,形成丹麦语版本(D-WORC),并评估其在接受关节镜下肩峰下减压或肩袖修复手术患者中的有效性、可靠性和反应性。

方法

将WORC原始版本进行跨文化改编为丹麦语,并使用手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍量表(DASH)、牛津肩部评分(OSS)、简短健康调查问卷36项版(Short Form-36)和整体评定量表评估其有效性、重测信度、反应性结构效度、内部一致性、组内相关系数(ICC)、一致性界限(LOA)和锚定最小重要变化值(MIC)。

结果

跨文化改编成功。D-WORC与DASH之间的相关性较高(皮尔逊相关系数(PCC)=0.71;95%置信区间(CI):0.60-0.79),D-WORC与OSS之间的相关性中等(PCC =0.67;95%CI:0.55-0.76)。可靠性分析显示ICC为0.80(95%CI:0.69-0.87),内部一致性为0.94(95%CI:0.92-0.95)。重测平均差异为76.4(±标准差=201.40)。WORC总分的LOA范围为-318.3(95%CI:-387.8--248.9)至471.2(95%CI:401.7-540.6)。总分的MIC为-211。

结论

D-WORC是一份有效、可靠且具有反应性的问卷,可用于丹麦人群。

资助

洛娜·德拉涅斯·布里克斯:家庭赫德·尼尔森基金会、居里和汉斯·恩格尔·弗里斯基金会、奥瑟和埃伊纳尔·丹尼尔森基金会、克努德和伊迪丝·埃里克森纪念基金会、中日德兰地区卫生科学研究基金会。

试验注册

丹麦数据保护局:1-16-02-653-15。

相似文献

1
The Danish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index.西安大略肩袖指数丹麦语版本。
Dan Med J. 2020 Feb;67(2).
2
Validation of the Polish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index in patients following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.西安大略肩袖指数波兰语版本在关节镜下肩袖修复术后患者中的验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 12;19(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2238-9.
3
Reproducibility: Reliability and agreement of short version of Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (Short-WORC) in patients with rotator cuff disorders.再现性:肩袖疾病患者中西安大略肩袖指数简版(Short-WORC)的可靠性和一致性
J Hand Ther. 2016 Jul-Sep;29(3):281-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
4
Validity and reliability of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Brazil.用于巴西的西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)的有效性和可靠性。
Clin J Sport Med. 2008 May;18(3):266-72. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817282f4.
5
The Western Ontario rotator cuff index in rotator cuff disease patients: a comprehensive reliability and responsiveness validation study.冈上肌肌腱病患者的 Western Ontario 肩袖指数:一项全面的可靠性和反应度验证研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1611-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546512446591. Epub 2012 May 10.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index.跨文化调适与义大利版 Western Ontario Rotator Cuff(WORC)指数的验证。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2024 Jun;108(2):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00812-y. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Greek version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index.跨文化调适与希腊版西部安大略肩肘(WORC)指数的验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jun;45(13):2175-2184. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2083704. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
8
Validity and Responsiveness of the Short Version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (Short-WORC) in Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair.《肩袖修补术后患者使用 Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index(WORC)短版的有效性和反应性》
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 May;48(5):409-418. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7928. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Translation and validation study of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index.西安大略肩袖指数波斯语版本的翻译与验证研究
Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;28(3):293-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-1042-6. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
10
A validation of the Swedish version of the WORC index in the assessment of patients treated by surgery for subacromial disease including rotator cuff syndrome.瑞典版WORC指数在评估接受手术治疗的肩峰下疾病(包括肩袖综合征)患者中的有效性验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Apr 14;17:165. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1014-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsiveness and clinically important differences of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index in surgical and non-surgical treatment groups with different follow-up periods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同随访期手术和非手术治疗组中西安大略肩袖(WORC)指数的反应性及临床重要差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Aug 1:17585732241268631. doi: 10.1177/17585732241268631.
2
Factors behind favorable long-term lung cancer survival in Norway compared to Denmark: a retrospective cohort study.与丹麦相比,挪威肺癌长期生存良好的背后因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur Clin Respir J. 2024 Oct 9;11(1):2414485. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2024.2414485. eCollection 2024.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index.
跨文化调适与义大利版 Western Ontario Rotator Cuff(WORC)指数的验证。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2024 Jun;108(2):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00812-y. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
4
Psychometric Properties of Full and Shortened Persian-version of Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index Questionnaires in Persian-speaking Patients with Shoulder Pain.西安大略肩袖指数问卷完整版和简化版波斯语版本在说波斯语的肩痛患者中的心理测量学特性
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Aug;10(8):668-676. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.64227.3082.
5
How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.如何评估肩部功能:对现有经过验证的结局指标的系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 8;11(5):845. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050845.