Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 13;10(1):2511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59339-y.
MiR-34a and miR-16 coordinately control cell cycle checkpoint in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. In cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) cells miR-16 regulates a switch between apoptosis and senescence, however the role of miR-34a in this process is unclear. Both miRNAs share many common targets and experimental evidences suggest that they synergistically control the cell-fate regulation of NSCLC. In this work we investigate whether the coordinate action between miR-34a and miR-16 can explain experimental results in multiple cell lines of NSCLC and CTCL. For that we propose a Boolean model of the G1/S checkpoint regulation contemplating the regulatory influences of both miRNAs. Model validation was performed by comparisons with experimental information from the following cell lines: A549, H460, H1299, MyLa and MJ presenting excellent agreement. The model integrates in a single logical framework the mechanisms responsible for cell fate decision in NSCLC and CTCL cells. From the model analysis we suggest that miR-34a is the main controller of miR-16 activity in these cells. The model also allows to investigate perturbations of single or more molecules with the purpose to intervene in cell fate mechanisms of NSCLC and CTCL cells.
miR-34a 和 miR-16 协同调控非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)细胞的细胞周期检验点。在皮肤 T 细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL)细胞中,miR-16 调节细胞凋亡和衰老之间的转换,然而 miR-34a 在这个过程中的作用尚不清楚。这两个 miRNA 具有许多共同的靶标,实验证据表明它们协同调控 NSCLC 的细胞命运调控。在这项工作中,我们研究了 miR-34a 和 miR-16 之间的协调作用是否可以解释 NSCLC 和 CTCL 多个细胞系的实验结果。为此,我们提出了一个考虑到这两个 miRNA 的调控影响的 G1/S 检验点调控的布尔模型。通过与以下细胞系的实验信息进行比较来验证模型:A549、H460、H1299、MyLa 和 MJ,结果非常吻合。该模型将 NSCLC 和 CTCL 细胞中负责细胞命运决定的机制整合到一个单一的逻辑框架中。从模型分析中,我们认为 miR-34a 是这些细胞中 miR-16 活性的主要控制器。该模型还允许研究单个或多个分子的扰动,目的是干预 NSCLC 和 CTCL 细胞的细胞命运机制。