• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于极度高龄患者,胆总管结石取石是否总是必要的?

Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?

作者信息

Okuda Naoko, Sugimoto Shinya, Nakamura Haruka, Hisada Hirohisa, Temma Taishi, Hashimoto Yuki, Hayashi Satoshi, Ito Tatsuya, Takami Mayuko, Oyamada Jun, Kamei Akira

机构信息

Divisions of Gastroenterology Ise Red Cross Hospital Mie Japan.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2019 May 30;4(1):16-21. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12198. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/jgh3.12198
PMID:32055692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7008169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic stone removal has some complications. Although the life expectancy of elderly patients has increased dramatically worldwide, little information is available on the necessity of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients.

METHODS

All extremely elderly patients (>90 years) who underwent endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis at our hospital between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The included patients were divided into complete stone removal and incomplete stone removal groups. Complication rate, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 73 patients were included in this study. The median number of stones was one (range, 0-10) and two (range, 1-12) ( = 0.043), while the median diameter of the largest stones was 9 (range, 0-27) and 14 (range, 5-46) mm ( = 0.001) in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. During the follow-up period, OS was 60% and 39% and DSS was 95% and 97% in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis found no significant difference in OS and DSS between the two groups ( = 0.052 and  = 0.646, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Complete stone removal might not always be necessary in extremely elderly patients aged ≥90 years.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜下取石存在一些并发症。尽管全球老年患者的预期寿命已大幅提高,但关于极高龄患者完全内镜下取石必要性的信息却很少。本研究旨在评估极高龄患者完全内镜下取石的安全性和有效性。

方法

对2012年1月至2017年1月在我院接受内镜下胆总管结石取石术的所有极高龄患者(>90岁)进行回顾性评估。纳入的患者分为结石完全清除组和不完全清除组。比较两组的并发症发生率、总生存率(OS)和疾病特异性生存率(DSS)。

结果

本研究共纳入73例患者。结石完全清除组和不完全清除组的结石中位数分别为1个(范围0 - 10个)和2个(范围1 - 12个)(P = 0.043),最大结石的中位数直径分别为9 mm(范围0 - 27 mm)和14 mm(范围5 - 46 mm)(P = 0.001)。随访期间,结石完全清除组和不完全清除组的OS分别为60%和39%,DSS分别为95%和97%。Kaplan-Meier分析发现两组的OS和DSS无显著差异(分别为P = 0.052和P = 0.646)。

结论

对于年龄≥90岁的极高龄患者,可能并非总是需要完全清除结石。

相似文献

1
Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?对于极度高龄患者,胆总管结石取石是否总是必要的?
JGH Open. 2019 May 30;4(1):16-21. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12198. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Long-term Outcomes of Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis in Patients ≥90 Years Old: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.90岁及以上患者治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆总管结石的长期结局:一项多中心回顾性研究
Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;60(13):1989-1997. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6478-20. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Large common bile duct stones in high-risk elderly patients: Immediate endoscopic stone removal or elective stone removal? A single-center retrospective study.高龄高危患者的较大胆总管结石:即刻内镜取石还是择期取石?一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02976-0.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Single-Session Endoscopic Stone Removal for Acute Cholangitis Associated with Choledocholithiasis.单次内镜取石术治疗急性胆管炎合并胆总管结石的疗效和安全性。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug 8;2018:3145107. doi: 10.1155/2018/3145107. eCollection 2018.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Removal of Common Bile Duct Stones in Elderly Patients ≥90 Years of Age.90岁及以上老年患者内镜下胆总管结石取出术的安全性和有效性
Intern Med. 2019 Aug 1;58(15):2125-2132. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2546-18. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
6
Endoscopic plastic stenting for bile duct stones: stent changing on demand or every 3 months. A prospective comparison study.内镜下塑料支架置入治疗胆管结石:按需更换支架或每 3 个月更换一次。一项前瞻性对比研究。
Endoscopy. 2013 Dec;45(12):1014-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344556. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
7
Biliary stenting as alternative therapy to stone clearance in elderly patients with bile duct stones.胆管支架置入术作为老年胆管结石患者结石清除的替代治疗方法。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2014 Sep;77(3):297-301.
8
Effectiveness and safety of biliary stenting in the management of difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients.胆管支架置入术治疗老年患者复杂胆总管结石的有效性和安全性
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;27(1):30-6. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.150305. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Accurate Evaluation of Residual Common Bile Duct Stones by Endoscopic Ultrasound: A Two-Step Check Method for Residual Stone Clearance.经内镜超声对残余胆总管结石的准确评估:一种残余结石清除的两步法检查方法。
Digestion. 2022;103(3):224-231. doi: 10.1159/000521925. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis.比较老年胆石症患者姑息性胆道支架置入术与胆管清除术的疗效和安全性:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 10;21(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01956-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Outcomes of Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis in Patients ≥90 Years Old: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.90岁及以上患者治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆总管结石的长期结局:一项多中心回顾性研究
Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;60(13):1989-1997. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6478-20. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Nonagenarian Patients: Is It Really Safe?老年患者的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术:它真的安全吗?
Clin Endosc. 2018 Jul;51(4):375-380. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.123. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
Adverse events in older patients undergoing ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的不良事件:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2014 Mar;2(1):E28-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365281. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
3
ERCP in elderly patients: increased risk of sedation adverse events but low frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
老年患者的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术:镇静不良事件风险增加,但内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎发生率较低。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec;82(6):1051-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
4
Is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography safe in patients 90 years of age and older?90岁及以上患者行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术是否安全?
Gut Liver. 2014 Sep;8(5):552-6. doi: 10.5009/gnl13310. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
5
Endoscopic plastic stenting for bile duct stones: stent changing on demand or every 3 months. A prospective comparison study.内镜下塑料支架置入治疗胆管结石:按需更换支架或每 3 个月更换一次。一项前瞻性对比研究。
Endoscopy. 2013 Dec;45(12):1014-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344556. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
6
Complications of ERCP.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的并发症
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.010.
7
Biliary stenting in the management of large or multiple common bile duct stones.胆管支架置入术在大或多发胆总管结石治疗中的应用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1200-1203.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.055. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
8
Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后并发症的发生率:前瞻性研究的系统综述。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.
9
Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older.90岁及以上患者治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的疗效与安全性
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Mar;63(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.051.
10
Ulinastatin for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled trial.乌司他丁用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Apr;3(4):376-83. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00671-8.