Campbell Harlan, Lakens Daniël
Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021 Feb;74(1):64-89. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12201. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
Determining a lack of association between an outcome variable and a number of different explanatory variables is frequently necessary in order to disregard a proposed model (i.e., to confirm the lack of a meaningful association between an outcome and predictors). Despite this, the literature rarely offers information about, or technical recommendations concerning, the appropriate statistical methodology to be used to accomplish this task. This paper introduces non-inferiority tests for ANOVA and linear regression analyses, which correspond to the standard widely used F test for and R , respectively. A simulation study is conducted to examine the Type I error rates and statistical power of the tests, and a comparison is made with an alternative Bayesian testing approach. The results indicate that the proposed non-inferiority test is a potentially useful tool for 'testing the null'.
为了摒弃一个提出的模型(即确认结果与预测变量之间不存在有意义的关联),常常需要确定一个结果变量与多个不同解释变量之间缺乏关联。尽管如此,文献中很少提供有关用于完成此任务的适当统计方法的信息或技术建议。本文介绍了用于方差分析和线性回归分析的非劣效性检验,它们分别对应于广泛使用的用于F检验和R检验的标准方法。进行了一项模拟研究以检验这些检验的I型错误率和统计功效,并与另一种贝叶斯检验方法进行了比较。结果表明,所提出的非劣效性检验是用于“检验原假设”的潜在有用工具。