Kwon So Ran, Cortez Elisa, Wang Min, Jagwani Mohit, Oyoyo Udochukwu, Li Yiming
Center for Dental Research, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA, USA,
University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Am J Dent. 2020 Feb;33(1):17-24.
To review and assess the literature on in vitro studies evaluating tooth bleaching efficacy considering the use of a negative control, type of tooth substrate, storage medium, color evaluation methods, and evaluation time points.
The following databases were searched: PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science. Search used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in PubMed in addition to free text. The following limits were applied: English, articles published between January 1989 and October 2017. Additional free text key terms included: in vitro, tooth bleaching, placebo, negative control, overall CIELAB color change (ΔE*ab), change in shade guide units (ΔSGU), tooth color stabilization, evaluation time points, bovine teeth, and staining. Search was repeated in Web of Science but no additional articles were identified. A total of 11 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis.
The meta-analysis of nine included studies that reported ΔE*ab values, revealed that the NC statistically exceeded the perceptibility threshold (PT) of 1.2 (P< 0.05). The estimate was 2.872 with lower and upper bounds of 1.955 and 3.790, respectively.
Randomized controlled trials are gold standards to evaluate bleaching efficacy of different materials. However, in vitro studies offer a way to screen for potential bleaching efficacy. It is vital to determine an appropriate cut-off value for determining bleaching efficacy in vitro and further apply for clinical relevance.
回顾和评估关于体外研究的文献,这些研究在考虑使用阴性对照、牙齿基质类型、储存介质、颜色评估方法和评估时间点的情况下,评估牙齿漂白效果。
检索了以下数据库:PubMed(MEDLINE)、科学网。除自由文本外,在PubMed中使用医学主题词(MeSH)进行检索。应用了以下限制条件:英文,1989年1月至2017年10月发表的文章。其他自由文本关键词包括:体外、牙齿漂白、安慰剂、阴性对照、总CIELAB颜色变化(ΔE*ab)、色标单位变化(ΔSGU)、牙齿颜色稳定性、评估时间点、牛牙和染色。在科学网中重复检索,但未识别出其他文章。共纳入11项研究进行定性和定量分析。
对9项报告了ΔE*ab值的纳入研究进行的荟萃分析显示,阴性对照在统计学上超过了1.2的可感知阈值(PT)(P<0.05)。估计值为2.872,下限和上限分别为1.955和3.790。
随机对照试验是评估不同材料漂白效果的金标准。然而,体外研究提供了一种筛选潜在漂白效果的方法。确定体外确定漂白效果的合适临界值并进一步应用于临床相关性至关重要。