• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人际心理治疗对创伤后应激障碍的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 1;264:286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.12.021. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
2
A Meta-Analysis of Interpersonal and Psychodynamic Psychotherapies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.创伤后应激障碍的人际和心理动力学心理治疗的荟萃分析。
Am J Psychother. 2024 Sep 1;77(3):119-128. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20230043. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
3
Interpersonal psychotherapy versus sertraline for women with posttraumatic stress disorder following recent sexual assault: a randomized clinical trial.人际心理治疗与舍曲林治疗近期性侵犯后创伤后应激障碍女性:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Oct 14;13(2):2127474. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2127474. eCollection 2022.
4
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Critical Review of the Evidence.创伤后应激障碍的人际心理治疗:证据的批判性综述
J Clin Psychiatry. 2024 May 29;85(2):23nr15172. doi: 10.4088/JCP.23nr15172.
6
Is Exposure Necessary? A Randomized Clinical Trial of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for PTSD.暴露是否必要?创伤后应激障碍人际心理治疗的一项随机临床试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 May;172(5):430-40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14070908. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
7
History of sexual trauma moderates psychotherapy outcome for posttraumatic stress disorder.性创伤史会影响创伤后应激障碍心理治疗的效果。
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Aug;34(8):692-700. doi: 10.1002/da.22619. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Efficacy of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸)辅助心理治疗创伤后应激障碍的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;96:109735. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109735. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
Do Acute Benefits of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Endure?人际心理治疗对创伤后应激障碍的急性获益能持续吗?
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;63(1):37-43. doi: 10.1177/0706743717720690. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Interpersonal Psychotherapy of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder for Veterans and Family Members: An Open Trial.创伤后应激障碍老兵及其家庭成员的人际心理治疗:一项开放试验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Aug 1;72(8):866-873. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000355. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in patients with cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.心理干预对癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 24;103(21):e38155. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038155.
2
Healing wounded trees: clinicians' perspectives on treatment of complex posttraumatic stress disorder.治愈受伤的树木:临床医生对复杂性创伤后应激障碍治疗的观点
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 9;15:1356862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1356862. eCollection 2024.
3
The Psychedelic Future of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Treatment.
创伤后应激障碍治疗的迷幻未来。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(4):636-735. doi: 10.2174/1570159X22666231027111147.
4
The effectiveness of psychological interventions for reducing PTSD and psychological distress in first responders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心理干预对减少第一响应者 PTSD 和心理困扰的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 24;17(8):e0272732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272732. eCollection 2022.
5
Workforce situation of the Chinese mental health care system: results from a cross-sectional study.中国心理健康保健系统的劳动力状况:一项横断面研究的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 22;22(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04204-7.
6
Polygenic risk for traumatic loss-related PTSD in US military veterans: Protective effect of secure attachment style.创伤后应激障碍相关 PTSD 多基因风险与美国退伍军人:安全依恋风格的保护作用。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;22(10):792-799. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2021.1907721. Epub 2021 May 20.

人际心理治疗对创伤后应激障碍的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 1;264:286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.12.021. Epub 2019 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2019.12.021
PMID:32056763
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence for the efficacy of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is urgently required. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in reducing the symptoms of PTSD.

METHODS

Five databases were searched from inception until November 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of IPT in patients with PTSD symptoms. The reference lists of included studies were also hand searched. A random effects model was used to estimate changes in a clinician-administered PTSD scale, or self-reported symptoms.

RESULTS

Of 509 screened abstracts, ten clinical trials (11 study arms) involving 755 patients with PTSD symptoms were included. Nine studies (10 study arms) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall standardized mean difference was -0.44 (CI: -0.69, -0.19), p = 0.0005. This represents a change in the clinically administrated PTSD Scale (CAPS) of approximately 12 points. IPT was not superior to other active controls, such as medication and non-IPT psychotherapies, but was significantly superior to passive controls, such as waiting list and educational pamphlets.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies modified the IPT protocol and did not comprehensively assess clinician fidelity to the protocol. The included studies generally had small sample sizes and were of limited quality.

CONCLUSIONS

IPT may be an effective treatment for PTSD, but clinical trials with larger sample sizes and improved methodology are required to confirm effects.

摘要

背景

迫切需要证据来证明创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗方法的疗效。本系统评价和荟萃分析检查了人际心理治疗(IPT)在减轻 PTSD 症状方面的疗效。

方法

从建库到 2018 年 11 月,我们检索了 5 个数据库,以确定评估 IPT 对 PTSD 症状患者疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。还对手册搜索了纳入研究的参考文献列表。采用随机效应模型来估计临床医生管理的 PTSD 量表或自我报告症状的变化。

结果

在筛选的 509 篇摘要中,有 10 项临床试验(11 个研究臂)纳入了 755 名 PTSD 症状患者。9 项研究(10 个研究臂)纳入了荟萃分析。总体标准化均数差为-0.44(CI:-0.69,-0.19),p=0.0005。这代表临床管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS)的变化约为 12 分。IPT 并不优于其他活性对照物,如药物和非 IPT 心理治疗,但明显优于被动对照物,如等待名单和教育小册子。

局限性

大多数研究修改了 IPT 方案,并且没有全面评估临床医生对方案的遵守程度。纳入的研究通常样本量较小,质量有限。

结论

IPT 可能是 PTSD 的一种有效治疗方法,但需要更大样本量和改进方法学的临床试验来确认疗效。