Cioffi Andrea, Cioffi Fernanda
Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Fertilitas Day Surgery Reproductive Medicine, Salerno, Italy.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Jan;69:101891. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101891. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
In Italy, the law n. 40 of 2004 (Norms in matter of medically assisted procreation), allows to access to the techniques of Medically assisted Procreation (MAP) exclusively to couples formed by two individuals of different sex. On the basis of this law, two couples of homosexual women were prohibited from using MAP techniques. For this reason, the couples have appealed to the competent courts that have raised doubts of constitutional legitimacy. In June 2019, the Italian Constitutional Court stated that it is not illegal to prohibit gay couples from accessing MAP techniques. In October 2019, the judgment No. 221, in which this decision is based, was published. Following the publication of the judgment, a bioethical-legal debate arose on this issue: is this a discrimination, or a simple limit based on medical-legal criteria?
在意大利,2004年第40号法律(《医学辅助生殖相关规范》)规定,只有由两名不同性别的个体组成的夫妇才能使用医学辅助生殖(MAP)技术。基于这项法律,两对同性恋女性伴侣被禁止使用MAP技术。因此,这些伴侣向主管法院提起上诉,法院对该法律的合宪性提出了质疑。2019年6月,意大利宪法法院裁定,禁止同性恋伴侣使用MAP技术并不违法。2019年10月,基于这一裁决的第221号判决公布。判决公布后,围绕这一问题引发了一场生物伦理法律辩论:这是一种歧视,还是仅仅基于医学法律标准的限制?