• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防性应用网片加固在预防腹正中切口疝中的作用:荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。

Prevention of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy with prophylactic mesh reinforcement: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):357-368. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50261. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50261
PMID:32057193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7260413/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is a frequent complication after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic mesh reinforcement (PMR) after midline laparotomy in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was the incidence of incisional hernia after follow-up of at least 12 months. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. Only RCTs were included. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs were included, comprising 1815 patients. The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly lower after PMR compared with sutured closure (risk ratio (RR) 0·35, 95 per cent c.i. 0·21 to 0·57; P < 0·001). Both onlay (RR 0·26, 0·11 to 0·67; P = 0·005) and retromuscular (RR 0·28, 0·10 to 0·82; P = 0·02) PMR led to a significant reduction in the rate of incisional hernia. The occurrence of seroma was higher in patients who had onlay PMR (RR 2·23, 1·10 to 4·52; P = 0·03). PMR did not result in an increased rate of surgical-site infection.

CONCLUSION

PMR of a midline laparotomy using an onlay or retromuscular technique leads to a significant reduction in the rate of incisional hernia in high-risk patients. Individual risk factors should be taken into account to select patients who will benefit most. [Correction added on 19 February 2020, after first online publication: J. García Alamino has been amended to J. M. Garcia-Alamino].

摘要

背景

切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症。本研究旨在评估腹部正中切开术后预防性使用补片加强(PMR)以降低切口疝发生率的效果。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南进行荟萃分析。主要结局是随访至少 12 个月后的切口疝发生率。次要结局是术后并发症。仅纳入 RCTs。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并进行试验序贯分析。

结果

共纳入 12 项 RCTs,包含 1815 例患者。与缝合关闭相比,PMR 后切口疝发生率显著降低(风险比(RR)0.35,95%置信区间 0.21 至 0.57;P<0.001)。无论是网片上置(RR 0.26,0.11 至 0.67;P=0.005)还是腹直肌后(RR 0.28,0.10 至 0.82;P=0.02)PMR 都显著降低了切口疝的发生率。网片上置 PMR 患者的血清肿发生率更高(RR 2.23,1.10 至 4.52;P=0.03)。PMR 并未导致手术部位感染发生率增加。

结论

对于高危患者,采用网片上置或腹直肌后技术对腹部正中切开术进行 PMR 可显著降低切口疝发生率。应考虑个体危险因素,以选择最能从中获益的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/c19b78171c38/BJS5-4-357-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/aa5aaf2c070b/BJS5-4-357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/ddcbe8fc03e9/BJS5-4-357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/e03eac53c474/BJS5-4-357-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/243e00d130dc/BJS5-4-357-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/68b680797fb7/BJS5-4-357-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/1ac9ebf1e14a/BJS5-4-357-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/c19b78171c38/BJS5-4-357-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/aa5aaf2c070b/BJS5-4-357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/ddcbe8fc03e9/BJS5-4-357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/e03eac53c474/BJS5-4-357-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/243e00d130dc/BJS5-4-357-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/68b680797fb7/BJS5-4-357-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/1ac9ebf1e14a/BJS5-4-357-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11b/7260413/c19b78171c38/BJS5-4-357-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevention of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy with prophylactic mesh reinforcement: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.预防性应用网片加固在预防腹正中切口疝中的作用:荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):357-368. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50261. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
2
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement versus Sutured Closure to Prevent Incisional Hernias after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair via Midline Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.剖腹开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术后应用预防性网片加强与缝线缝合预防切口疝的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;56(1):120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
3
Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开腹手术后使用小缝线腹壁闭合术加或不加网片增强进行疝修补(HULC试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3.
4
Prophylactic mesh reinforcement for midline incisional hernia prevention: systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.预防性网片加固在预防中线切口疝中的应用:系统评价和随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):213-224. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02660-4. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性网片覆盖加强与单纯缝合预防中线切口疝的随机对照多中心双盲 2 年随访研究(PRIMA)
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在择期正中剖腹手术中预防性放置补片是否能降低切口疝的发生率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1149-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
7
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial.两种不同连续缝合技术关闭筋膜后择期正中切口手术伤口并发症的随机对照试验研究方案:COFACTOR 试验
Trials. 2020 Jul 2;21(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04507-8.
8
Abdominal Closure and the Risk of Incisional Hernia in Aneurysm Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹部闭合术与动脉瘤手术切口疝风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;59(2):227-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.041. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Abdominal incision defect following AAA-surgery (AIDA): 2-year results of prophylactic onlay-mesh augmentation in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.腹切口缺损在 AAA 手术后(AIDA):多中心、双盲、随机对照试验中预防性覆盖补片增强的 2 年结果。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1105-1116. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01125-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
Prevention of Incisional Hernias by Prophylactic Mesh-augmented Reinforcement of Midline Laparotomies for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.预防性使用补片加强腹主动脉瘤治疗中行正中剖腹术切口的疝修补:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):638-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001369.

引用本文的文献

1
Variable use of modern abdominal wall closure techniques at emergency laparotomy - an international, cross-sectional survey of surgical practice.急诊剖腹手术中现代腹壁关闭技术的使用差异——一项关于手术实践的国际横断面调查
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 18;51(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02804-y.
2
Short-term outcomes in mesh versus suture-only treatment of burst abdomen: a case-series from a university hospital.补片与单纯缝合治疗腹部爆裂伤的短期结局:来自一家大学医院的病例系列研究
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03279-x.
3
The MESH-RTL Project for prevention of abdominal wound dehiscence (AWD) in high-risk patients: noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the use of prophylactic mesh to standard midline closure in the reduction of incisional herniae.比较预防性补片与标准中线缝合在减少切口疝方面应用的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):843-853. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1653-4. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性网片覆盖加强与单纯缝合预防中线切口疝的随机对照多中心双盲 2 年随访研究(PRIMA)
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
用于预防高危患者腹部伤口裂开(AWD)的MESH-RTL项目:非劣效性随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7634-7646. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11358-w. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Surgical Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal: A Single-Center Comparative Study.开放手术与腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术的手术结局:一项单中心比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 18;16(8):e67102. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67102. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Advances and Techniques in Subcuticular Suturing for Abdominal Wall Closure: A Comprehensive Review.腹壁闭合皮下缝合的进展与技术:全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Jul 21;16(7):e65069. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65069. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
The clinical consequences of burst abdomen after emergency midline laparotomy: a prospective, observational cohort study.急诊中线剖腹术后发生腹部爆裂的临床后果:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1861-1870. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03104-x. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
7
Prophylactic slowly resorbable mesh in midline laparotomy to limit incisional hernia incidence: the prospective 'Mesh Augmented Reinforcement of Abdominal Wall Suture Line (MARS)' cohort study protocol.中线剖腹手术中使用预防性缓慢可吸收补片以降低切口疝发生率:前瞻性“腹壁缝线处补片增强(MARS)”队列研究方案
Int J Surg Protoc. 2024 Apr 2;28(2):58-63. doi: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000023. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia in urological surgery.系统回顾和荟萃分析泌尿系统手术切口疝的发生率。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 May 28;409(1):166. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03354-4.
9
Contemporary Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Emerging Techniques and Trends.当代腹壁重建:新兴技术与趋势
J Clin Med. 2024 May 13;13(10):2876. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102876.
10
Ventral hernia repair in India: a Delphi consensus.印度腹外疝修补术:德尔菲共识。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1511-1523. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03062-4. Epub 2024 May 9.
Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
在择期正中剖腹手术中预防性放置补片是否能降低切口疝的发生率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1149-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Mesh reinforcement for the prevention of incisional hernia formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.用于预防切口疝形成的补片加固:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Surg Res. 2017 Mar;209:17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.055. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
5
Surgical registries for advancing quality and device surveillance.用于提升质量和器械监测的外科手术登记系统。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1358-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31402-7.
6
Prevention of Incisional Hernias by Prophylactic Mesh-augmented Reinforcement of Midline Laparotomies for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.预防性使用补片加强腹主动脉瘤治疗中行正中剖腹术切口的疝修补:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):638-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001369.
7
The economic burden of incisional ventral hernia repair: a multicentric cost analysis.切口疝修补术的经济负担:一项多中心成本分析。
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):819-830. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1480-z. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
8
A Risk Model and Cost Analysis of Incisional Hernia After Elective, Abdominal Surgery Based Upon 12,373 Cases: The Case for Targeted Prophylactic Intervention.基于12373例病例的择期腹部手术后切口疝的风险模型与成本分析:靶向预防性干预的案例
Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):1010-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001394.
9
Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Factors Affecting Midline Incisional Hernia Rates: Analysis of 14,618 Patients.影响中线切口疝发生率因素的系统评价与Meta回归分析:对14618例患者的分析
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 21;10(9):e0138745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138745. eCollection 2015.
10
Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.小切口与大切口关闭腹部正中切口的比较(STITCH):一项双盲、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1254-1260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7. Epub 2015 Jul 15.