Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Environmental and Fisheries Sciences Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA.
Harmful Algae. 2020 Jan;91:101729. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101729. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
This review assesses harmful algal bloom (HAB) modeling in the context of climate change, examining modeling methodologies that are currently being used, approaches for representing climate processes, and time scales of HAB model projections. Statistical models are most commonly used for near-term HAB forecasting and resource management, but statistical models are not well suited for longer-term projections as forcing conditions diverge from past observations. Process-based models are more complex, difficult to parameterize, and require extensive calibration, but can mechanistically project HAB response under changing forcing conditions. Nevertheless, process-based models remain prone to failure if key processes emerge with climate change that were not identified in model development based on historical observations. We review recent studies on modeling HABs and their response to climate change, and the various statistical and process-based approaches used to link global climate model projections and potential HAB response. We also make several recommendations for how the field can move forward: 1) use process-based models to explicitly represent key physical and biological factors in HAB development, including evaluating HAB response to climate change in the context of the broader ecosystem; 2) quantify and convey model uncertainty using ensemble approaches and scenario planning; 3) use robust approaches to downscale global climate model results to the coastal regions that are most impacted by HABs; and 4) evaluate HAB models with long-term observations, which are critical for assessing long-term trends associated with climate change and far too limited in extent.
本综述评估了气候变化背景下的有害藻华 (HAB) 建模,考察了目前正在使用的建模方法、表示气候过程的方法以及 HAB 模型预测的时间尺度。统计模型最常用于短期 HAB 预测和资源管理,但由于强迫条件与过去的观测结果不同,统计模型不太适合长期预测。基于过程的模型更复杂、难以参数化且需要广泛的校准,但可以根据变化的强迫条件来模拟 HAB 的响应。然而,如果在基于历史观测的模型开发中没有识别出与气候变化相关的关键过程,那么基于过程的模型仍然容易出现故障。我们回顾了最近关于 HAB 建模及其对气候变化响应的研究,以及用于将全球气候模型预测与潜在 HAB 响应联系起来的各种统计和基于过程的方法。我们还提出了一些如何推动该领域发展的建议:1)使用基于过程的模型来明确表示 HAB 发展中的关键物理和生物因素,包括在更广泛的生态系统背景下评估 HAB 对气候变化的响应;2)使用集合方法和情景规划来量化和传达模型不确定性;3)使用稳健的方法将全球气候模型结果向下扩展到受 HAB 影响最大的沿海地区;4)使用长期观测评估 HAB 模型,这对于评估与气候变化相关的长期趋势至关重要,但在范围上过于有限。