Morin Jean-Benoit, Capelo-Ramirez Fernando, Rodriguez-Pérez Manuel A, Cross Matt R, Jimenez-Reyes Pedro
University of Côte d'Azur, LAMHESS, Nice, France.
Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Apr 1;36(4):1158-1161. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003546.
Morin, JB, Capelo-Ramirez, F, Rodriguez-Pérez, MA, Cross, MR, and Jimenez-Reyes, P. Individual adaptation kinetics following heavy resisted sprint training. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1158-1161, 2022-The aim of this study was to test individual adaptation kinetics to a high-resistance sprint training program designed to improve maximal horizontal power (Pmax), and compare the group and individual results of a classical "pre-post" analysis, and a "pre-peak" approach. Thirteen male and 9 female trained sprinters had their 30-m sprint performance and mechanical outputs assessed 1 week before (PRE), and one (POST, W1), 2 (W2), 3 (W3) and 4 (W4) weeks after a 10-week training block (10 repetitions of 20-m resisted sprints at the load associated to the apex of their velocity-power relationship: i.e., 90 ± 10% body mass on average (range: 75-112%). We observed clearly different outcomes on all variables for the PRE-POST vs. PRE-PEAK analyses. The PRE-PEAK analysis showed a larger (almost double) increase in Pmax (9.98 ± 5.27% on average, p < 0.01) than the PRE-POST (5.39 ± 5.87%, p < 0.01). Individual kinetics of post-training adaptations show that peak values were not captured in the POST (W1) assessment (generally observed at W3 and W4). Finally, the week of greatest Pmax output differed strongly among subjects, with most subjects (7/22) peaking at W4. In conclusion, after a 10-week high-resistance sprint training block, a classical 1-week-PRE to 1-week-POST assessment could not capture peak adaptation, which differed among athletes. Adopting a similar approach in practice or research should improve insight into the true effects of training stimuli on athletic capabilities.
莫林,JB,卡佩洛 - 拉米雷斯,F,罗德里格斯 - 佩雷斯,MA,克罗斯,MR,以及希门尼斯 - 雷耶斯,P。高强度抗阻冲刺训练后的个体适应动力学。《力量与体能研究杂志》36(4): 1158 - 1161,2022年 - 本研究的目的是测试个体对旨在提高最大水平功率(Pmax)的高阻力冲刺训练计划的适应动力学,并比较经典“前后”分析和“前峰值”方法的组间和个体结果。13名男性和9名女性训练有素的短跑运动员在为期10周的训练阶段(20米抗阻冲刺重复10次,负荷与他们速度 - 功率关系的顶点相关:即平均体重的90±10%(范围:75 - 112%))前1周(PRE)、后1周(POST,W1)、2周(W2)、3周(W3)和4周(W4)时评估他们的30米短跑成绩和机械输出。我们观察到,对于前后分析与前峰值分析,所有变量的结果明显不同。前峰值分析显示Pmax的增加幅度更大(几乎翻倍)(平均增加9.98±%,p <),高于前后分析(5.39±5.87%,p <)。训练后适应的个体动力学表明,峰值未在POST(W1)评估中捕获(通常在W3和W4观察到)。最后,最大Pmax输出的周数在受试者之间差异很大,大多数受试者(7/22)在W4达到峰值。总之,在为期10周的高阻力冲刺训练阶段后,经典的从训练前1周到训练后1周的评估无法捕获峰值适应,而峰值适应在运动员之间存在差异。在实践或研究中采用类似方法应能提高对训练刺激对运动能力真实影响的认识。 (注:原文中部分数据后的±%表述似乎有误,已按原文翻译)