Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):e173-e191. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004192.
To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for adults with acute or acute on chronic liver failure in the ICU.
The guideline panel comprised 29 members with expertise in aspects of care of the critically ill patient with liver failure and/or methodology. The Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures manual and conflict-of-interest policy were followed throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the panel, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development.
The panel was divided into nine subgroups: cardiovascular, hematology, pulmonary, renal, endocrine and nutrition, gastrointestinal, infection, perioperative, and neurology.
We developed and selected population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes questions according to importance to patients and practicing clinicians. For each population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes question, we conducted a systematic review aiming to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence whenever applicable, and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence to decision framework to facilitate recommendations formulation as strong or conditional. We followed strict criteria to formulate best practice statements.
In this article, we report 29 recommendations (from 30 population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes questions) on the management acute or acute on chronic liver failure in the ICU, related to five groups (cardiovascular, hematology, pulmonary, renal, and endocrine). Overall, six were strong recommendations, 19 were conditional recommendations, four were best-practice statements, and in two instances, the panel did not issue a recommendation due to insufficient evidence.
Multidisciplinary international experts were able to formulate evidence-based recommendations for the management acute or acute on chronic liver failure in the ICU, acknowledging that most recommendations were based on low-quality indirect evidence.
为重症监护病房(ICU)中治疗急性或亚急性肝衰竭成人患者的临床医生制定循证建议。
指南小组由 29 名成员组成,他们在肝功能衰竭重症患者护理的各个方面具有专业知识,以及方法学方面的专业知识。整个过程都遵循了重症监护医学学会的标准操作程序手册和利益冲突政策。小组内的电话会议和电子讨论,以及小组内的分组讨论,都是指南制定不可或缺的一部分。
小组分为九个分组:心血管、血液学、呼吸、肾脏、内分泌和营养、胃肠、感染、围手术期和神经科。
我们根据对患者和临床医生的重要性,制定和选择了人群、干预、比较和结局问题。对于每个人群、干预、比较和结局问题,我们进行了系统评价,旨在确定最佳现有证据,在适用时对证据进行统计总结,并使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach)评估证据质量。我们使用证据决策框架来促进推荐的制定,包括强推荐或条件推荐。我们遵循严格的标准制定最佳实践声明。
在本文中,我们报告了 29 项关于 ICU 中急性或亚急性肝衰竭管理的建议(来自 30 个人群、干预、比较和结局问题),涉及五个组(心血管、血液学、呼吸、肾脏和内分泌)。总的来说,有 6 项是强推荐,19 项是条件推荐,4 项是最佳实践声明,在两种情况下,由于证据不足,小组没有发布推荐。
多学科国际专家能够为 ICU 中急性或亚急性肝衰竭的管理制定循证建议,承认大多数建议是基于低质量的间接证据。