Suppr超能文献

赛后干针疗法不能减轻后续的酸痛和抽筋——一项随机对照试验

Postrace Dry Needling Does Not Reduce Subsequent Soreness and Cramping-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Cushman Daniel M, Cummings Keith, Skinner Lee, Holman Anna, Haight Peter, Brobeck Matthew, Teramoto Masaru, Tang Chi

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Departments of Physical Therapy; and.

出版信息

Clin J Sport Med. 2021 May 1;31(3):225-231. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000794.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether a single session of postrace dry needling can decrease postrace soreness and quantity of postrace leg cramps in half-marathon and full-marathon runners.

DESIGN

Single-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Finish line of 2018 Salt Lake City Marathon & Half-Marathon.

PARTICIPANTS

Runners aged 18 years or older who completed a marathon or half-marathon.

INTERVENTIONS

True or sham dry needling of the bilateral vastus medialis and soleus muscles within 1 hour of race completion by 2 experienced practitioners.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was numeric pain rating improvements for soreness on days 1, 2, 3, and 7 compared to immediately postrace. Secondary outcome measures included number of postrace cramps and subjective improvement of soreness.

RESULTS

Sixty-two runners were included with 28 receiving true and 34 receiving sham dry needling. Objective pain scores showed an increase in pain of the soleus muscles at days 1 and 2 (P ≤ 0.003 and P ≤ 0.041, respectively) in the dry needling group. No differences were seen in postrace pain in the vastus medialis muscles (P > 0.05). No association was seen between treatment group and presence of postrace cramping at any time point (P > 0.05). Subjectively, there was a nonsignificant trend for those receiving dry needling to feel better than expected over time (P = 0.089), but no difference with cramping (P = 0.396).

CONCLUSIONS

A single postrace dry needling session does not objectively improve pain scores or cramping compared to sham therapy.

摘要

目的

确定单次赛后干针疗法能否减轻半程马拉松和全程马拉松跑者的赛后酸痛感及赛后腿部抽筋的次数。

设计

单盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验。

地点

2018年盐湖城马拉松及半程马拉松赛终点线。

参与者

年龄在18岁及以上且完成马拉松或半程马拉松的跑者。

干预措施

2名经验丰富的从业者在比赛结束后1小时内对双侧股内侧肌和比目鱼肌进行真干针或假干针治疗。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是与赛后即刻相比,第1、2、3和7天酸痛的数字疼痛评分改善情况。次要观察指标包括赛后抽筋次数和酸痛的主观改善情况。

结果

纳入62名跑者,其中28名接受真干针治疗,34名接受假干针治疗。客观疼痛评分显示,干针治疗组在第1天和第2天比目鱼肌疼痛增加(分别为P≤0.003和P≤0.041)。股内侧肌的赛后疼痛无差异(P>0.05)。在任何时间点,治疗组与赛后抽筋的发生之间均无关联(P>0.05)。主观上,接受干针治疗的人随着时间推移感觉比预期更好,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.089),但与抽筋情况无差异(P = 0.396)。

结论

与假治疗相比,单次赛后干针治疗并不能客观地改善疼痛评分或抽筋情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验