Profu AB, Götaforsliden 13, 43134 Mölndal, Sweden; Profu AB, Götaforsliden 13, 43134 Mölndal, Sweden.
Energy and Climate Studies Division, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen 68, Stockholm 10044, Sweden.
Waste Manag. 2020 Mar 15;105:128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.038. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
Chemical recycling is considered an attractive technological pathway for reducing waste and greenhouse gas emissions, as well as promoting circular economy. In the EU, readiness to develop a full commercial plant is becoming increasingly important given the ambitious goal to recycle all plastics by 2030. Household packaging streams tend to be of lower quality and lower recycling performance compared to industrial and commercial waste streams, thus requiring particular attention. This paper assesses chemical recycling technologies available and identifies the most suitable for recycling of household plastic waste. We identify eight different technologies and compare them in terms of process temperature, sensitivity to feedstock contamination and level of polymer breakdown, three critical factors affecting the cost and attractiveness of a chemical process. In addition, we carry out a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) assessment for eight technologies based on the stage of their present development. The review is based on peer-reviewed scientific papers and information collected from technology developers and providers, as well as interviews with experts. Our analysis outlines advantages and disadvantages of technologies available for chemical plastic recycling and their TRL. The chemical recycling technologies with the highest TRL are pyrolysis, catalytic cracking and conventional gasification. However, the economic feasibility of these technologies is difficult to assess due to the low number of projects in operation and scarcity of data available for comparison. The results of this analysis provide timely information as policy makers and developers set targets for recycling, and contemplate investments on research and chemical plastic recovering plants.
化学回收被认为是减少废物和温室气体排放、促进循环经济的一种有吸引力的技术途径。在欧盟,鉴于到 2030 年回收所有塑料的雄心勃勃的目标,开发全商业化工厂的准备工作变得越来越重要。与工业和商业废物相比,家庭包装废物的质量和回收性能往往较低,因此需要特别注意。本文评估了现有的化学回收技术,并确定了最适合回收家用塑料废物的技术。我们确定了八种不同的技术,并在工艺温度、对原料污染的敏感性和聚合物分解程度三个关键因素方面对它们进行了比较,这些因素影响着化学工艺的成本和吸引力。此外,我们根据现有发展阶段对八种技术进行了技术准备水平(TRL)评估。该综述基于同行评议的科学论文和从技术开发商和供应商收集的信息,以及对专家的采访。我们的分析概述了可用的化学塑料回收技术及其 TRL 的优缺点。具有最高 TRL 的化学回收技术是热解、催化裂化和常规气化。然而,由于运营项目数量较少,可用数据稀缺,难以评估这些技术的经济可行性。随着政策制定者和开发商设定回收目标,并考虑在研究和化学塑料回收工厂上的投资,这项分析的结果提供了及时的信息。