Poli Emiliano, Jong Kwang H, Hassanali Ali
International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy.
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 14;11(1):901. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14659-5.
The origin of the apparent negative charge at hydrophobic-water interfaces has fueled debates in the physical chemistry community for decades. The most common interpretation given to explain this observation is that negatively charged hydroxide ions (OH) bind strongly to the interfaces. Using first principles calculations of extended air-water and oil-water interfaces, we unravel a mechanism that does not require the presence of OH. Small amounts of charge transfer along hydrogen bonds and asymmetries in the hydrogen bond network due to topological defects can lead to the accumulation of negative surface charge at both interfaces. For water near oil, some spillage of electron density into the oil phase is also observed. The computed surface charge densities at both interfaces is approximately [Formula: see text] in agreement with electrophoretic experiments. We also show, using an energy decomposition analysis, that the electronic origin of this phenomena is rooted in a collective polarization/charge transfer effect.
疏水-水界面处表观负电荷的起源在物理化学界引发了数十年的争论。对这一现象最常见的解释是,带负电荷的氢氧根离子(OH)与界面强烈结合。通过对扩展的空气-水和油-水界面进行第一性原理计算,我们揭示了一种不需要OH存在的机制。沿着氢键的少量电荷转移以及由于拓扑缺陷导致的氢键网络不对称性,会导致两个界面处都积累负表面电荷。对于油附近的水,还观察到一些电子密度泄漏到油相中。两个界面处计算得到的表面电荷密度约为[公式:见原文],与电泳实验结果一致。我们还通过能量分解分析表明,这一现象的电子起源源于集体极化/电荷转移效应。