DTU Aqua, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Section for Inland Fisheries and Ecology, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Department of Biology - Aquatic Ecology, Ecology Building, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
J Fish Biol. 2020 Apr;96(4):1055-1059. doi: 10.1111/jfb.14292. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
Passive integrated transponder (PIT)-tagging is commonly used in behavioural studies of fish, although long-term evaluations of effects from tagging under natural conditions are scarce. We PIT-tagged common bream Abramis brama, European perch Perca fluviatilis, pike Esox lucius and roach Rutilus rutilus, released them in their lakes of origin and recaptured them after 103-3269 days. Overall, tagged fish did not differ in condition from non-tagged fish, except for small R. rutilus that had a lower length-specific body mass in one lake in 1 year. We conclude that PIT-tagging in general has negligible long-term effects on fish condition.
被动集成式 transponder (PIT)-标记在鱼类行为研究中被广泛应用,尽管有关标记对自然条件下鱼类影响的长期评估还很少。我们对鲤鱼 Abramis brama、欧洲鲈鱼 Perca fluviatilis、梭鲈 Esox lucius 和斜齿鳊 Rutilus rutilus 进行了 PIT 标记,然后将它们放回原湖泊,并在 103-3269 天后对其进行了捕捞。总体而言,除了在 1 年内某一湖泊中的小斜齿鳊的特定体长体重较低外,标记鱼与未标记鱼在健康状况方面没有差异。我们的结论是,一般来说,PIT 标记对鱼类的健康状况没有长期的负面影响。