IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Australian National Cancer Symptom Trials Group, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Eur J Pain. 2020 May;24(5):983-991. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1548. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Pain in people with advanced cancer is prevalent. When a stable dose of opioids is established, people still experience episodic breakthrough pain for which dosing of an immediate release opioid is usually a proportion of the total daily dose.
This multi-site, double blind, randomized trial tested three dose proportions (1/6, 1/8, 1/12 of total daily dose) in two blocks, each block with three dose proportions in random order (6 numbered bottles in total). When participants required opioid breakthrough doses and it was their first breakthrough dose for that study day, they took the next numbered bottle rather than their usual breakthrough dose. (Subsequent doses on that day reverted to their usual dose.) RESULTS: Eighty-five people were randomized in this study of whom 81 took at least one dose and 73 (90%) took at least block one (one of each dose proportion). No dose was found to be optimal at 30 min with approximately one-third of participants showing maximal reduction with each dose proportion. Median time to pain relief was 120 min. There were no differences in harms: drowsiness, confusion, nausea or vomiting at 30, 60 or 120 min.
This adequately powered study did not show any difference with three dose proportions for reduction in pain intensity, time to pain relief, pain control on the subsequent day nor any difference in harms. From first principles, this suggests 1/12 the 24 hourly dose should be used as the lowest dose that delivers benefit. Future studies should include a placebo arm.
Despite the widespread use of immediate release morphine solution for breakthrough cancer pain, the ideal dose derived from background dose has not been determined in an adequately powered randomized, double-blind, crossover, dose ranging study. This study tested three dose levels in people with advanced cancer. Given no differences in time to onset, level of analgesia achieved, nor side effects, the lowest dose tested (1/12th of the daily dose) should be used.
晚期癌症患者普遍存在疼痛。当确定了稳定剂量的阿片类药物后,患者仍会出现间歇性爆发性疼痛,此时通常需要给予即时释放阿片类药物治疗,其剂量通常为总日剂量的一部分。
本多中心、双盲、随机试验在两个阶段测试了三种剂量比例(总日剂量的 1/6、1/8、1/12),每个阶段以随机顺序(总共 6 个编号瓶)包含三种剂量比例。当参与者需要阿片类药物爆发性剂量,且这是他们当天的第一次爆发性剂量时,他们会服用下一个编号瓶,而不是他们通常的爆发性剂量。(那天的后续剂量恢复为他们通常的剂量。)
这项研究共纳入了 85 名随机患者,其中 81 名至少服用了一剂药物,73 名(90%)至少服用了第一阶段的药物(每种剂量比例各一剂)。在 30 分钟时,没有一种剂量是最佳的,大约三分之一的参与者在每种剂量比例下都表现出最大的缓解效果。疼痛缓解的中位时间为 120 分钟。在 30、60 和 120 分钟时,没有出现嗜睡、意识模糊、恶心或呕吐等不良事件的差异。
这项充分有力的研究没有显示三种剂量比例在减轻疼痛强度、疼痛缓解时间、次日疼痛控制方面有任何差异,也没有显示在不良事件方面有任何差异。从基本原则来看,这表明应使用 24 小时剂量的 1/12 作为能带来获益的最低剂量。未来的研究应包括安慰剂组。
尽管即时释放吗啡溶液广泛用于治疗爆发性癌痛,但在一项充分有力的随机、双盲、交叉、剂量范围研究中,尚未确定最佳剂量。本研究在晚期癌症患者中测试了三种剂量水平。由于在发作时间、达到的镇痛水平和不良反应方面没有差异,因此应使用测试的最低剂量(日剂量的 1/12)。