Howard S, Fitzgerald G, Gallagher S
SASHLab, Centre for Social Issues Research, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland.
Department of Psychology, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick, Ireland.
Physiol Behav. 2020 May 15;219:112832. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112832. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
While hospital admissions for cardiac causes on a population level appear to rise when the national team is playing in a sporting fixture, little research has examined cardiovascular reactions in spectators watching a sporting event. In a sample of 41 male supporters of a rugby team, all of whom had played the sport themselves, cardiovascular levels and psychological ratings of stress and anxiety were measured pre- and post-match. Counterfactual thinking was also assessed. Mixed factorial ANOVA analyses showed that in supporters who had recently retired from playing, psychological ratings of stress and anxiety were significantly lower pre-match compared to those who had long-retired (all ps < 0.001). However, significant phase × player status interactions identified that systolic blood pressure, F(1, 39) = 13.93, p = .001, partial ƞ = 0.26, diastolic blood pressure, F(1,39) = 24.62, p < .001, partial η = 39, and heart rate, F(1, 39) = 23.02, p < .001, partial η = 0.37, increased significantly in recent-retired players compared to long-retired players, indicating that they found watching the match more stressful than the long-retired players. Furthermore, this effect was moderated by counterfactual thinking in recent-retired players only, where greater levels of counterfactual thinking was associated with greater cardiovascular reactivity. These findings confirm that watching a sporting fixture induces cardiovascular reactivity in spectators who recently retired from the sport, with counterfactual thinking a possible underlying pathway.
虽然在国家队参加体育赛事期间,全国范围内因心脏问题住院的人数似乎会上升,但很少有研究考察观看体育赛事的观众的心血管反应。在一个由41名橄榄球队男性支持者组成的样本中,他们所有人都曾亲自参与过这项运动,在比赛前后测量了他们的心血管水平以及压力和焦虑的心理评分。同时也评估了反事实思维。混合因子方差分析表明,在最近刚退役的支持者中,与长期退役的支持者相比,赛前压力和焦虑的心理评分显著更低(所有p值<0.001)。然而,显著的阶段×球员状态交互作用表明,收缩压,F(1, 39) = 13.93,p = 0.001,偏η² = 0.26,舒张压,F(1,39) = 24.62,p < 0.001,偏η² = 0.39,以及心率,F(1, 39) = 23.02,p < 0.001,偏η² = 0.37,与长期退役的球员相比,最近退役的球员显著升高,这表明他们发现观看比赛比长期退役的球员压力更大。此外,这种效应仅在最近退役的球员中受到反事实思维的调节,反事实思维水平越高,心血管反应性越强。这些发现证实,观看体育赛事会在最近刚从这项运动退役的观众中引发心血管反应,反事实思维可能是一种潜在的途径。