Suppr超能文献

一种寻求解释的好奇心的功能主义方法。

A functional approach to explanation-seeking curiosity.

作者信息

Liquin Emily G, Lombrozo Tania

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Peretsman Scully Hall, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2020 Jun;119:101276. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101276. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Abstract

Why do some (and only some) observations prompt people to ask "why?" We propose a functional approach to "Explanation-Seeking Curiosity" (ESC): the state that motivates people to seek an explanation. If ESC tends to prompt explanation search when doing so is likely to be beneficial, we can use prior work on the functional consequences of explanation search to derive "forward-looking" candidate triggers of ESC-those that concern expectations about the downstream consequences of pursuing explanation search. Across three studies (N = 867), we test hypotheses derived from this functional approach. In Studies 1-3, we find that ESC is most strongly predicted by expectations about future learning and future utility. We also find that judgments of novelty, surprise, and information gap predict ESC, consistent with prior work on curiosity; however, the role for forward-looking considerations is not reducible to these factors. In Studies 2-3, we find that predictors of ESC form three clusters, expectations about learning (about the target of explanation), expectations about export (to other cases and future contexts), and backward-looking considerations (having to do with the relationship between the target of explanation and prior knowledge). Additionally, these clusters are consistent across stimulus sets that probe ESC, but not fact-seeking curiosity. These findings suggest that explanation-seeking curiosity is aroused in a systematic way, and that people are not only sensitive to the match or mismatch between a given stimulus and their current or former beliefs, but to how they expect an explanation for that stimulus to improve their epistemic state.

摘要

为什么有些(且只有一些)观察会促使人们问“为什么”?我们提出了一种针对“寻求解释的好奇心”(ESC)的功能性方法:即促使人们寻求解释的状态。如果ESC在寻求解释可能有益时倾向于促使人们进行解释搜索,那么我们可以利用先前关于解释搜索功能后果的研究来推导ESC的“前瞻性”候选触发因素——那些与对进行解释搜索的下游后果的预期有关的因素。在三项研究(N = 867)中,我们检验了从这种功能性方法得出的假设。在研究1至3中,我们发现ESC最强烈地由对未来学习和未来效用的预期所预测。我们还发现,新颖性、惊讶感和信息差距的判断能预测ESC,这与先前关于好奇心的研究一致;然而,前瞻性考量的作用不能简化为这些因素。在研究2至3中,我们发现ESC的预测因素形成三个集群,即对学习的预期(关于解释的目标)、对输出的预期(到其他案例和未来情境)以及回顾性考量(与解释目标和先验知识之间的关系有关)。此外,这些集群在探测ESC的刺激集之间是一致的,但在探测寻求事实的好奇心的刺激集之间并非如此。这些发现表明,寻求解释的好奇心是以一种系统的方式被激发的,而且人们不仅对给定刺激与他们当前或先前信念之间的匹配或不匹配敏感,还对他们期望对该刺激的解释如何改善其认知状态敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验