Suppr超能文献

捕捉、阐明并巩固好奇心与创造力的联系。

Capturing, clarifying, and consolidating the curiosity-creativity connection.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 12;12(1):15300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19694-4.

Abstract

The cognitive-motivational concepts of curiosity and creativity are often viewed as intertwined. Yet, despite the intuitively strong linkage between these two concepts, the existing cognitive-behavioral evidence for a curiosity-creativity connection is not strong, and is nearly entirely based on self-report measures. Using a new lab-based Curiosity Q&A task we evaluate to what extent behaviorally manifested curiosity-as revealed in autonomous inquiry and exploration-is associated with creative performance. In a preregistered study (N = 179) we show that, as hypothesized, the novelty of the questions that participants generated during the Curiosity Q&A Task significantly positively correlated with the originality of their responses on a divergent-thinking task (the conceptually-based Alternative Uses Task). Additionally, the extent to which participants sought out information that was implicitly missing in the presented factual stimuli ("gap-related information foraging") positively correlated with performance on two predominantly convergent-thinking tasks (the Remote Associates Task and Analogy Completion). Question asking, topic-related information foraging, and creative performance correlated with trait-based "interest-type" curiosity oriented toward exploration and novelty, but not with "deprivation-type" curiosity focused on dispelling uncertainty or ignorance. Theoretically and practically, these results underscore the importance of continuing to develop interventions that foster both creative thinking and active autonomous inquiry.

摘要

好奇心和创造力的认知-动机概念通常被视为相互交织的。然而,尽管这两个概念之间存在直观上的强烈联系,但现有认知-行为证据表明好奇心和创造力之间的联系并不强,而且几乎完全基于自我报告的测量。我们使用一种新的基于实验室的好奇心问答任务来评估,在多大程度上表现出的好奇心——在自主探究和探索中体现出来的好奇心——与创造性表现相关。在一项预先注册的研究(N=179)中,我们表明,正如假设的那样,参与者在好奇心问答任务中提出的问题的新颖性与他们在发散思维任务(基于概念的替代用途任务)中的回答的原创性呈显著正相关。此外,参与者寻求隐含在呈现的事实刺激中缺失的信息的程度(与差距相关的信息采集)与两个主要的聚合思维任务(远程联想任务和类比完成任务)的表现呈正相关。问题提出、主题相关信息采集和创造性表现与基于特质的“兴趣型”好奇心相关,这种好奇心倾向于探索和新颖性,而与关注消除不确定性或无知的“剥夺型”好奇心无关。这些结果从理论和实践上强调了继续开发促进创造性思维和主动自主探究的干预措施的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/094f/9468176/17318d1c60dd/41598_2022_19694_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验