Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;87(8):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03222-1. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
To highlight different patterns of clinical presentation, share authors' experience in the management of children following button battery ingestion and their outcomes.
This is a single center descriptive cohort study with a total duration of 5 y (January 2014 through December 2018). Battery removal was performed by urgent rigid esophagoscopy following department protocols. Outcomes and complications were observed in the post-operative period in all children. Contrast esophagogram was performed at 4-6 wk post battery removal for assessing esophageal emptying and detecting sequelae (stricture).
Fifty-two children (M:F = 31:21) with a mean age (+SD) at presentation of 47 (+27) mo were managed at authors' center during the study period. Most common source of button battery was electronic appliance remote (50%) and common symptoms at presentation were vomiting after feeds, dysphagia, chest pain etc. During endoscopic retrieval, majority (60%) of the batteries were lodged in the upper esophagus and predominant impaction was noticed at anterior wall (81%) of esophagus. Upon injury assessment, grade 3 followed by grade 2 were detected in 59% and 41% cases respectively. Five children developed complications. Two deaths due to catastrophic hemorrhage (aorto-esophageal fistula) and refractory sepsis (tracheoesophageal fistula) occurred in present cohort. While contrast esophagogram was normal in all survivors, self-limiting symptoms like mild chest pain during swallowing and cough were observed during the follow-up. Median (IQR) duration of hospital stay and follow-up were 2 d (1-2.75) and 14.5 mo (8.5-17.5) respectively.
Accidental button battery ingestion can be life-threatening. Diagnosis is often delayed due to non-specific clinical presentation and unwitnessed ingestions. Esophagoscopic retrieval is the treatment modality of choice. Despite having significant esophageal injury at the time of removal, no long-term sequelae (clinical or radiological) were observed in present study.
强调不同的临床表现模式,分享作者在处理吞下纽扣电池的儿童方面的经验及其结果。
这是一项单中心描述性队列研究,总持续时间为 5 年(2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月)。根据部门方案,通过紧急硬性食管镜检查进行电池取出。在所有儿童的术后期间观察结果和并发症。在电池取出后 4-6 周进行对比食管造影,以评估食管排空情况并发现后遗症(狭窄)。
在研究期间,作者所在中心共收治了 52 名(男:女=31:21)平均年龄(+标准差)为 47(+27)个月的儿童。纽扣电池最常见的来源是电子设备遥控器(50%),最常见的临床表现是喂食后呕吐、吞咽困难、胸痛等。在内镜取出过程中,大多数(60%)电池位于食管上段,主要嵌顿在前壁(81%)。在损伤评估中,分别发现 59%和 41%的病例为 3 级和 2 级。有 5 名儿童出现并发症。本队列中发生了 2 例因灾难性出血(主动脉食管瘘)和难治性感染(气管食管瘘)而死亡的病例。虽然所有幸存者的对比食管造影均正常,但在随访期间观察到了自限性症状,如吞咽时轻度胸痛和咳嗽。住院和随访的中位数(IQR)分别为 2 天(1-2.75)和 14.5 个月(8.5-17.5)。
意外吞下纽扣电池可能危及生命。由于临床表现不典型和未被目击的摄入,诊断往往会延迟。食管镜检查是首选的治疗方法。尽管在取出时存在明显的食管损伤,但在本研究中未观察到长期后遗症(临床或影像学)。