Suppr超能文献

小儿食管纽扣电池:来自一家三级医疗中心的经验。

Esophageal Button Battery in the Pediatric Population: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;87(8):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03222-1. Epub 2020 Feb 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To highlight different patterns of clinical presentation, share authors' experience in the management of children following button battery ingestion and their outcomes.

METHODS

This is a single center descriptive cohort study with a total duration of 5 y (January 2014 through December 2018). Battery removal was performed by urgent rigid esophagoscopy following department protocols. Outcomes and complications were observed in the post-operative period in all children. Contrast esophagogram was performed at 4-6 wk post battery removal for assessing esophageal emptying and detecting sequelae (stricture).

RESULTS

Fifty-two children (M:F = 31:21) with a mean age (+SD) at presentation of 47 (+27) mo were managed at authors' center during the study period. Most common source of button battery was electronic appliance remote (50%) and common symptoms at presentation were vomiting after feeds, dysphagia, chest pain etc. During endoscopic retrieval, majority (60%) of the batteries were lodged in the upper esophagus and predominant impaction was noticed at anterior wall (81%) of esophagus. Upon injury assessment, grade 3 followed by grade 2 were detected in 59% and 41% cases respectively. Five children developed complications. Two deaths due to catastrophic hemorrhage (aorto-esophageal fistula) and refractory sepsis (tracheoesophageal fistula) occurred in present cohort. While contrast esophagogram was normal in all survivors, self-limiting symptoms like mild chest pain during swallowing and cough were observed during the follow-up. Median (IQR) duration of hospital stay and follow-up were 2 d (1-2.75) and 14.5 mo (8.5-17.5) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Accidental button battery ingestion can be life-threatening. Diagnosis is often delayed due to non-specific clinical presentation and unwitnessed ingestions. Esophagoscopic retrieval is the treatment modality of choice. Despite having significant esophageal injury at the time of removal, no long-term sequelae (clinical or radiological) were observed in present study.

摘要

目的

强调不同的临床表现模式,分享作者在处理吞下纽扣电池的儿童方面的经验及其结果。

方法

这是一项单中心描述性队列研究,总持续时间为 5 年(2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月)。根据部门方案,通过紧急硬性食管镜检查进行电池取出。在所有儿童的术后期间观察结果和并发症。在电池取出后 4-6 周进行对比食管造影,以评估食管排空情况并发现后遗症(狭窄)。

结果

在研究期间,作者所在中心共收治了 52 名(男:女=31:21)平均年龄(+标准差)为 47(+27)个月的儿童。纽扣电池最常见的来源是电子设备遥控器(50%),最常见的临床表现是喂食后呕吐、吞咽困难、胸痛等。在内镜取出过程中,大多数(60%)电池位于食管上段,主要嵌顿在前壁(81%)。在损伤评估中,分别发现 59%和 41%的病例为 3 级和 2 级。有 5 名儿童出现并发症。本队列中发生了 2 例因灾难性出血(主动脉食管瘘)和难治性感染(气管食管瘘)而死亡的病例。虽然所有幸存者的对比食管造影均正常,但在随访期间观察到了自限性症状,如吞咽时轻度胸痛和咳嗽。住院和随访的中位数(IQR)分别为 2 天(1-2.75)和 14.5 个月(8.5-17.5)。

结论

意外吞下纽扣电池可能危及生命。由于临床表现不典型和未被目击的摄入,诊断往往会延迟。食管镜检查是首选的治疗方法。尽管在取出时存在明显的食管损伤,但在本研究中未观察到长期后遗症(临床或影像学)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验