• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2007-2020 年食管纽扣电池嵌顿的表现和初步处理的单中心回顾性研究。

Single-Center Retrospective Review of the Presentation and Initial Care of Esophageal Button Battery Impactions 2007-2020.

机构信息

From the Pediatric Gastroenterology.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Department of Pediatrics.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Apr 1;39(4):259-264. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002690. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000002690
PMID:35353766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9519803/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to characterize the patient population and initial presentation and care of esophageal button battery ingestion and provide descriptive data including factors affecting accurate diagnosis, duration of battery exposure, and battery removal.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from 2007 to 2020 at a single-center, large-volume, urban academic pediatric hospital system. Included participants were children 6 months to 18 years old who underwent removal of an esophageal button battery impaction at our institution.

RESULTS

Our cohort comprised 63 patients; ages ranged from 7 to 87 months with a median of 27 months. Median button battery size was 2.12 cm with 59% lodged in the proximal esophagus. A prolonged impaction, greater than 12 hours, occurred in 46% of patients. Risk ratio analysis demonstrated that lack of caregiver suspicion of ingestion was associated with prolonged impaction (risk ratio, 3.39; confidence interval, 2.15-5.34). Misdiagnosis of button battery ingestion occurred in 10% of cases. The majority of patients, 87%, required transfer from a referring facility with a median total distance of 37 miles (range, 1.4-160 miles) from home to facility where battery was removed.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study describes the initial presentation and care of a large cohort of pediatric esophageal button battery ingestion. It emphasizes the continued need for primary prevention, prompt identification, and removal of these batteries. There are many challenges in caring for these patients involving multiple pediatric disciplines, and guidelines encompassing a multidisciplinary approach would be beneficial.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述食管纽扣电池吞食患者的人群特征、初始表现和治疗情况,并提供包括影响准确诊断的因素、电池暴露时间以及电池取出时间等描述性数据。

方法

这是一项 2007 年至 2020 年在单中心、大容量、城市学术儿科医院系统进行的回顾性队列研究。纳入研究对象为在我院接受食管纽扣电池嵌顿取出术的 6 个月至 18 岁儿童。

结果

本队列纳入 63 例患者,年龄 7 至 87 个月,中位数为 27 个月。纽扣电池中位大小为 2.12cm,59%位于食管近端。46%的患者纽扣电池嵌顿时间超过 12 小时。风险比分析表明,看护者对吞食的怀疑不足与嵌顿时间延长有关(风险比,3.39;置信区间,2.15-5.34)。纽扣电池吞食的误诊发生率为 10%。87%的患者需要从转诊机构转至治疗机构,转诊中位总距离为 37 英里(范围,1.4-160 英里)。

结论和相关性

本研究描述了一大组儿科食管纽扣电池吞食患者的初始表现和治疗情况。研究强调了纽扣电池的持续一级预防、及时识别和取出的重要性。此类患者的治疗涉及多个儿科专科,存在许多挑战,制定涵盖多学科方法的指南将是有益的。

相似文献

1
Single-Center Retrospective Review of the Presentation and Initial Care of Esophageal Button Battery Impactions 2007-2020.2007-2020 年食管纽扣电池嵌顿的表现和初步处理的单中心回顾性研究。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Apr 1;39(4):259-264. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002690. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
Esophageal button battery impactions in children: an analysis of 89 cases.食管纽扣电池嵌顿在儿童中的应用:89 例分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jun 8;24(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04869-x.
3
Esophageal lesions following button-battery ingestion in children: Analysis of causes and proposals for preventive measures.儿童误吞纽扣电池后的食管病变:病因分析及预防措施建议
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018 Apr;135(2):91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
4
Evolving Trends of Button Battery Ingestion in Indian Children at a Tertiary Care Hospital.印度一家三级护理医院收治的儿童纽扣电池吞食的演变趋势。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Apr 1;38(4):e1201-e1206. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002548.
5
Identifying predictive factors for long-term complications following button battery impactions: A case series and literature review.确定纽扣电池嵌塞后长期并发症的预测因素:病例系列研究与文献综述
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Aug;87:198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
6
Esophageal Button Battery in the Pediatric Population: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.小儿食管纽扣电池:来自一家三级医疗中心的经验。
Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;87(8):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03222-1. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
7
Button battery injuries in the pediatric aerodigestive tract.小儿气道消化道纽扣电池损伤
Ear Nose Throat J. 2015 Dec;94(12):486-93.
8
History and radiographic findings as predictors for esophageal coins versus button batteries.食管内硬币与纽扣电池的病史和影像学表现预测因素。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;137:110208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110208. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
Esophageal button battery ingestion in children.儿童食管纽扣电池摄入
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017 Jul;23(4):306-310. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.72177.
10
Button battery versus stacked coin ingestion: A conundrum for radiographic diagnosis.纽扣电池与堆叠硬币吞食:放射诊断的难题。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;126:109627. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109627. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Timeliness of management of button battery impactions in children in the province of Ontario: a multi-center analysis.安大略省儿童纽扣电池嵌塞的管理及时性:一项多中心分析。
CJEM. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-01010-4.
2
Button Battery Ingestion: Exploring Socioeconomic Risk Factors.纽扣电池摄入:探索社会经济风险因素。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jul;173(1):96-105. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1206. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
3
Button Battery Ingestion in a Neonate: Risk, Management, and Implications.新生儿吞食纽扣电池:风险、处理及影响
Am J Case Rep. 2025 Feb 6;26:e944479. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.944479.
4
Esophageal button battery impactions in children: an analysis of 89 cases.食管纽扣电池嵌顿在儿童中的应用:89 例分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jun 8;24(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04869-x.