Suppr超能文献

用于评估上肢骨科手术中周围神经阻滞质量的新型复合量表。

New composite scale for evaluating peripheral nerve block quality in upper limb orthopaedics surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Division of Pain Medicine, Pécs 7634, Hungary.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Division of Pain Medicine, Pécs 7634, Hungary.

出版信息

Injury. 2021 Mar;52 Suppl 1:S78-S82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.048. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Developments in ultrasound guided (UG) peripheral nerve block (PNB) techniques have significant advantages for patients undergoing trauma surgery. Brachial plexus blockade (BPB) for upper extremity surgery provide superior analgesia, improve recovery and patient satisfaction. To the best of our knowledge there is no tool for evaluation of the quality of UG PNB which concerns the quality of PNB, the tolerance of the patient towards the anaesthetic approach, and postoperative analgesia as well.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Standardized UG BPB anaesthesia - was performed; interscalene-supraclavicular (ISC-SC) and axillary-supraclavicular (AX-SC) approach for upper limb surgery. A GCS like tool was developed with which the Sensory, Motor, Coping of patient and Postoperative (SMCP) pain qualities were measured. The quality of PNBs were evaluated by a quality of anaesthesia graded by anaesthesiologist (QAGA) and the SMCP scale as well, the means of midazolam and opioid consumption during surgery, vital parameters, postoperative pain intensity (VNRS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Ninety three unpremedicated adult patients with ASA I-III were scheduled for unilateral upper limb surgery. Nearly the same mean volumes of local anaesthetic solution were used in the AX-SC and ISC-SC groups (28.3-31.0 ml). There were no significant difference in the quality of PNB measured by QAGA or SMCP scale between the AX-SC and the ISC-SC groups, however 75 patients were assessed as Excellent with the SMCP scale vs. 39 with the QAGA. 97.8% of the patients were in the Excellent and Good category evaluated with SMPC vs. 86% with QAGA (p < 0.001). There was no surgery abandoned due to failed PNB and no tourniquet pain was detected. There was no evidence of side effects or complications of PNB during the follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

This composite tool is designed for evaluating the loss of sensory and motor function; the coping of the patient and the postoperative pain as well. Our novel SMCP evaluation tool focuses on the overall condition of the patient during surgery and in the postoperative period. This more precise outcome evaluating scale is significantly superior to the formerly used QAGA in representing the high success rate of UG PNB.

摘要

简介

超声引导(UG)外周神经阻滞(PNB)技术的发展为接受创伤手术的患者带来了显著优势。上肢手术的臂丛神经阻滞(BPB)可提供更好的镇痛效果,改善患者的恢复情况并提高其满意度。据我们所知,目前尚无用于评估 UG PNB 质量的工具,该工具涉及 PNB 的质量、患者对麻醉方法的耐受性以及术后镇痛效果。

患者与方法

对行上肢手术的患者实施了标准化的 UG BPB 麻醉,包括肌间沟-锁骨上(ISC-SC)和腋窝-锁骨上(AX-SC)入路。我们开发了一种类似于格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)的工具,通过该工具来测量患者的感觉、运动、应对能力和术后(SMCP)疼痛质量。通过麻醉医师对麻醉质量的分级(QAGA)和 SMCP 评分来评估 PNB 的质量,同时比较两组患者在手术期间咪达唑仑和阿片类药物的使用量、生命体征、术后疼痛强度(VNRS)。

结果

93 例未接受预麻醉的成年 ASA I-III 级患者拟行单侧上肢手术。AX-SC 和 ISC-SC 组使用的局部麻醉溶液平均体积几乎相同(28.3-31.0ml)。QAGA 或 SMCP 评分均未显示 AX-SC 和 ISC-SC 组之间 PNB 质量存在显著差异,然而,SMCP 评分中有 75 例患者被评估为优秀,而 QAGA 评分中仅有 39 例。SMCP 评分中有 97.8%的患者被评估为优秀和良好,而 QAGA 评分中仅有 86%的患者被评估为优秀和良好(p<0.001)。没有因 PNB 失败而放弃手术的情况,也没有检测到止血带疼痛。在随访期间,没有出现 PNB 的副作用或并发症。

讨论

这种综合工具旨在评估感觉和运动功能的丧失、患者的应对能力以及术后疼痛。我们新的 SMCP 评估工具侧重于患者在手术期间和术后的整体状况。与以前使用的 QAGA 相比,这种更精确的结果评估量表在代表 UG PNB 的高成功率方面具有明显优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验