Assistant Professor, Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre - TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Senior Lecturer, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jan;125(1):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
Information on the mechanical properties of the materials used for manufacturing computer-engineered complete dentures is scarce.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3 prepolymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resins used in the fabrication of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled complete dentures (CDs), as well as 2 denture base polymers used for conventionally fabricated CDs.
Three CAD-CAM materials were evaluated: Degos Dental L-Temp, IvoBase CAD, and Zirkonzahn Temp Basic Tissue. Two materials used for conventionally manufactured dentures were also included as controls (Palapress and Paladon 65). Each material type was sectioned into bars for flexural strength, nanohardness, elastic modulus, and surface microhardness evaluation (n=8/material). Half of the specimens were stored in water for 30 days, while the other half was dry-stored. A 2-way ANOVA was conducted to detect the effect of material and storage on the evaluated properties (α=.05). Linear contrasts were conducted to compare the differences among the 3 types of CAD-CAM material and the conventional ones.
Material type and storage had a significant influence on the flexural strength, nanohardness, elastic modulus, and surface hardness of the materials investigated (P<.001). The post hoc Scheffé test for flexural strength revealed a nonsignificant difference in the interaction between Degos L-Temp and Paladon (P=1.000). In terms of nanohardness, no difference was found when comparing Palapress with Paladon, as well as IvoBase CAD with Zirkonzahn Temp Basic (P=1.000). A nonsignificant interaction in terms of surface hardness was also found between IvoBase CAD and Palapress (P=.575).
The tested materials showed variation in their mechanical properties, with satisfactory behavior of the CAD-CAM materials. However, the results obtained when testing the materials used for the conventional fabrication of complete dentures suggest that their use might still be advisable.
用于制造计算机工程全口义齿的材料的机械性能信息有限。
本体外研究的目的是评估 3 种用于制造计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造 (CAD-CAM) 铣削全口义齿 (CD) 的预聚物聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯 (PMMA) 树脂以及 2 种用于传统制造 CD 的义齿基聚合物的机械性能。
评估了 3 种 CAD-CAM 材料:Degos Dental L-Temp、IvoBase CAD 和 Zirkonzahn Temp Basic Tissue。还包括 2 种用于传统制造义齿的材料作为对照(Palapress 和 Paladon 65)。每种材料类型都被切成用于弯曲强度、纳米硬度、弹性模量和表面显微硬度评估的棒材(n=8/material)。一半的样本在水中储存 30 天,另一半干燥储存。进行了 2 因素方差分析以检测材料和储存对评估性能的影响(α=.05)。进行线性对比以比较 3 种 CAD-CAM 材料与传统材料之间的差异。
材料类型和储存对所研究材料的弯曲强度、纳米硬度、弹性模量和表面硬度有显著影响(P<.001)。Scheffé 后测检验显示 Degos L-Temp 和 Paladon 之间的交互作用无显著差异(P=1.000)。在纳米硬度方面,Palapress 与 Paladon 之间以及 IvoBase CAD 与 Zirkonzahn Temp Basic 之间没有差异(P=1.000)。IvoBase CAD 和 Palapress 之间的表面硬度交互作用也不显著(P=.575)。
测试材料的机械性能存在差异,CAD-CAM 材料表现出良好的性能。然而,当测试用于传统制造全口义齿的材料时,得到的结果表明,它们的使用可能仍然是可取的。