Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden 01307, Germany.
Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Schwabstraße 13, Ulm 89075, Germany.
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Oct;64(4):498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
This analysis focused on periodontal health in shortened dental arches (SDAs).
In a randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with missing molars in one jaw and at least one premolar and canine on both sides were eligible for participation. In the partial removable dental prosthesis (PRDP) group (n = 79), molars were replaced with a precision attachment retained PRDP. In the SDA group (n == 71), the SDA up to the second premolars was either left as is or restored with fixed dental prostheses. Outcome variables were vertical clinical attachment loss (CAL-V), pocket probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PLI). For CAL-V and PPD, the changes at six measuring points per tooth were analyzed. For BOP and PLI, patient related rates were calculated for each point in time. Statistical methods included linear regression analyses.
In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis for CAL-V in the study jaw, the 10 year patient related mean changes were 0.66 mm in the PRDP group and -0.13 mm in the SDA group. The resulting mean patient related group difference of 0.79 mm (95% CI: 0.20 mm-1.38 mm) was significant (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the ITT analyses for PPD. For BOP and PLI, significant group differences with more favorable results for the SDA group were found.
In view of lacking substantial differences for CAL-V and PPD, the overall differences were considered of minor clinical relevance. The results add confirmatory evidence to the shortened dental arch concept and its clinical viability (controlled-trials.com ISRCTN97265367).
本分析专注于缩短牙弓的牙周健康。
在一项随机对照临床试验中,符合纳入标准的患者为单侧下颌缺磨牙,双侧至少各有一颗前磨牙和尖牙。在局部可摘义齿(PRDP)组(n=79)中,磨牙用精密附着体保留式 PRDP 修复。在缩短牙弓(SDA)组(n=71)中,SDA 止于第二前磨牙,要么保持原样,要么用固定修复体修复。观察的结果变量为垂直临床附着丧失(CAL-V)、牙周袋探诊深度(PPD)、探诊出血(BOP)和菌斑指数(PLI)。对于 CAL-V 和 PPD,分析每个牙齿的六个测量点的变化。对于 BOP 和 PLI,计算每个时间点的患者相关率。统计方法包括线性回归分析。
在研究牙的意向性治疗(ITT)分析中,PRDP 组的 10 年患者相关平均变化为 0.66mm,SDA 组为-0.13mm。因此,SDA 组的患者相关平均差值为 0.79mm(95%CI:0.20mm-1.38mm),具有统计学意义(p=0.01)。在 ITT 分析中,PPD 无显著差异。对于 BOP 和 PLI,SDA 组的结果具有显著的组间差异,且结果更有利。
鉴于 CAL-V 和 PPD 缺乏实质性差异,整体差异被认为具有较小的临床意义。这些结果为缩短牙弓的概念及其临床可行性提供了证实性证据(controlled-trials.com ISRCTN97265367)。