Suppr超能文献

肺癌诊断前多学科肿瘤委员会与分期时间:西储大学地铁健康中心的经验

Pre-diagnosis Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and Time to Staging in Lung Cancer: The Case Western MetroHealth Experience.

作者信息

Thalanayar Muthukrishnan Prashanth, Ratnam Maya, Nguyen Minh-Tri, Le Michael, Gunzler Douglas, Bruno Debora, Infeld Michael

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine / Metrohealth Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.

Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine / Metrohealth Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Jan 8;12(1):e6595. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6595.

Abstract

Introduction National guidelines support the discussion of cancer patients by multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB). We researched whether early pre-diagnosis multidisciplinary tumor board discussions are associated with shorter times to staging in lung cancer. Methods We reviewed our institution's lung cancer and MTB registries to retrospectively study if an early discussion at pre-diagnostic MTB (pd-MTB) influenced the timeliness of diagnostic evaluation. Over 14 months, 161 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer were included. Fifty-five patients were presented at pd-MTB while 106 (controls) patients were not. The primary outcome was the difference in the time interval from suspicious imaging (Ix) to completion of staging (Sx). Outcomes were adjusted for key confounders with a multiple regression analysis. Results For stages I, II, and III lung cancer, where time to therapy matters, early discussion of patients with nodules suspicious for malignancy at pd-MTB was associated with no time delays when compared to patients who were not discussed in pd-MTB. The mean time intervals for imaging to staging (with standard deviations) are 65 days in controls (sd = 42.67) and 75 days (sd = 58.27) in tumor board cases (p=0.39). Adjusting for confounders with a multiple regression analysis among all stages revealed a similar lack of difference in time intervals to diagnosis, staging, and therapy. Conclusion Our stage I-III lung cancer cases (pd-MTB) completed staging in a timely manner, similar to controls (no pd-MTB). The severity of illness at presentation and the availability of diagnostic services and others likely influence the results. Our manuscript shares important numerical data on timelines during cancer diagnosis and treatment. Using this data, prospective registries examining the process workflow may help standardize cancer quality goals and maximize referrals from primary-care/specialty providers. The key findings in our study create a paradigm for future studies to create and achieve "door-to-balloon" time targets for lung cancer care (akin to cardiac care) across different styles of tumor boards.

摘要

引言 国家指南支持多学科肿瘤委员会(MTB)对癌症患者进行讨论。我们研究了肺癌患者在诊断前进行多学科肿瘤委员会早期讨论是否与缩短分期时间相关。方法 我们查阅了本机构的肺癌和MTB登记资料,以回顾性研究诊断前MTB(pd-MTB)的早期讨论是否会影响诊断评估的及时性。在14个月的时间里,纳入了161例连续诊断为肺癌的患者。55例患者在pd-MTB上进行了讨论,而106例(对照组)患者未进行讨论。主要结局是从可疑影像学检查(Ix)到完成分期(Sx)的时间间隔差异。通过多元回归分析对结局进行关键混杂因素调整。结果 对于I、II和III期肺癌,治疗时间很重要,与未在pd-MTB上讨论的患者相比,在pd-MTB上对可疑恶性结节患者进行早期讨论并未导致时间延迟。对照组从影像学检查到分期的平均时间间隔(标准差)为65天(sd = 42.67),肿瘤委员会病例组为75天(sd = 58.27)(p = 0.39)。在所有分期中通过多元回归分析对混杂因素进行调整后,发现诊断、分期和治疗的时间间隔也没有差异。结论 我们的I-III期肺癌病例(pd-MTB)与对照组(无pd-MTB)一样及时完成了分期。就诊时疾病的严重程度以及诊断服务的可用性等因素可能会影响结果。我们的手稿分享了癌症诊断和治疗过程中重要的时间数据。利用这些数据,前瞻性登记研究过程工作流程可能有助于规范癌症质量目标,并最大限度地提高初级保健/专科医生的转诊率。我们研究中的关键发现为未来研究创造了一个范例,以便在不同类型的肿瘤委员会中为肺癌护理制定并实现“门球时间”目标(类似于心脏护理)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/155a/7003723/5730119f1c3c/cureus-0012-00000006595-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验