From the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637 (H.M.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (D.P.N.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (J.M.G.); Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (K.S.L.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.N.C.L.); Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.R.M.); Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (A.C.M.); Department of Radiology, Advanced Biomedical Imaging Research Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan (Y.O.); Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (C.A.P.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (M.P.); Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (G.D.R.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.); Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (W.D.T.); Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium (P.E.V.S.); and Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass (A.A.B).
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161659. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
The Fleischner Society Guidelines for management of solid nodules were published in 2005, and separate guidelines for subsolid nodules were issued in 2013. Since then, new information has become available; therefore, the guidelines have been revised to reflect current thinking on nodule management. The revised guidelines incorporate several substantive changes that reflect current thinking on the management of small nodules. The minimum threshold size for routine follow-up has been increased, and recommended follow-up intervals are now given as a range rather than as a precise time period to give radiologists, clinicians, and patients greater discretion to accommodate individual risk factors and preferences. The guidelines for solid and subsolid nodules have been combined in one simplified table, and specific recommendations have been included for multiple nodules. These guidelines represent the consensus of the Fleischner Society, and as such, they incorporate the opinions of a multidisciplinary international group of thoracic radiologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, pathologists, and other specialists. Changes from the previous guidelines issued by the Fleischner Society are based on new data and accumulated experience. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article. An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on March 13, 2017.
《弗勒施纳学会肺部结节管理指南》于 2005 年发布,2013 年又发布了肺部亚实性结节管理指南。此后,新的信息不断涌现,因此,指南进行了修订,以反映当前对结节管理的思考。修订后的指南纳入了一些实质性的改变,这些改变反映了当前对小结节管理的思考。常规随访的最小起始阈值已增大,推荐的随访间隔现在以范围而不是精确的时间段给出,以便放射科医生、临床医生和患者在考虑个人风险因素和偏好时有更大的自由裁量权。实性和亚实性结节的指南已合并在一个简化的表格中,并为多个结节纳入了具体的建议。这些指南代表了弗勒施纳学会的共识,因此,它们纳入了来自胸放射科医生、肺病学家、外科医生、病理学家和其他专家的多学科国际团体的意见。与弗勒施纳学会之前发布的指南相比,这些变化基于新的数据和积累的经验。RSNA,2017 在线补充材料可在此文章中获取。本文的早期版本曾在网上发布,内容有误。该文章于 2017 年 3 月 13 日进行了修正。