Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011, USA.
Sci Adv. 2019 Dec 18;5(12):eaay3761. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3761. eCollection 2019 Dec.
The tendency to see life as zero-sum exacerbates political conflicts. Six studies ( = 3223) examine the relationship between political ideology and zero-sum thinking: the belief that one party's gains can only be obtained at the expense of another party's losses. We find that both liberals and conservatives view life as zero-sum when it benefits them to do so. Whereas conservatives exhibit zero-sum thinking when the status quo is challenged, liberals do so when the status quo is being upheld. Consequently, conservatives view social inequalities-where the status quo is frequently challenged-as zero-sum, but liberals view economic inequalities-where the status quo has remained relatively unchallenged in past decades-as such. Overall, these findings suggest potentially important ideological differences in perceptions of conflict-differences that are likely to have implications for understanding political divides in the United States and the difficulty of reaching bipartisan legislation.
将生活视为零和会加剧政治冲突。六项研究(= 3223)检验了政治意识形态和零和思维之间的关系:即一方的收益只能以另一方的损失为代价。我们发现,当对自己有利时,自由派和保守派都会将生活视为零和。当现状受到挑战时,保守派会表现出零和思维,而当现状得到维持时,自由派则会这样做。因此,保守派将社会不平等——现状经常受到挑战——视为零和,但自由派将经济不平等——过去几十年现状相对未受到挑战——视为如此。总的来说,这些发现表明,在对冲突的看法上存在潜在的重要意识形态差异,这些差异可能对理解美国的政治分歧以及达成两党立法的困难产生影响。