可持续发展政策的跨学科证据原则
Cross-discipline evidence principles for sustainability policy.
作者信息
Game Edward T, Tallis Heather, Olander Lydia, Alexander Steven M, Busch Jonah, Cartwright Nancy, Kalies Elizabeth L, Masuda Yuta J, Mupepele Anne-Christine, Qiu Jiangxiao, Rooney Andrew, Sills Erin, Sutherland William J
机构信息
The Nature Conservancy, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
出版信息
Nat Sustain. 2018 Sep;1(9):452-454. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0141-x. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
Abstract
Evidence-based approaches to sustainability challenges must draw on knowledge from the environment, development and health communities. To be practicable, this requires an approach to evidence that is broader and less hierarchical than the standards often applied within disciplines.
摘要
应对可持续发展挑战的循证方法必须借鉴来自环境、发展和健康领域的知识。要切实可行，这就需要一种比各学科通常采用的标准更宽泛、层级性更低的循证方法。
相似文献
1
Cross-discipline evidence principles for sustainability policy.可持续发展政策的跨学科证据原则
Nat Sustain. 2018 Sep;1(9):452-454. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0141-x. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
2
Bridging the gaps in sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review, 2014-2023.弥合可持续性评估中的差距：2014 - 2023年系统文献综述
Eval Program Plann. 2025 Jun;110:102557. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102557. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
4
Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy.基于社区的健康项目可持续性规划：研究、实践与政策的概念框架及未来方向
Health Educ Res. 1998 Mar;13(1):87-108. doi: 10.1093/her/13.1.87.
5
Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 3. Discipline, inter-discipline distance, and selection of discipline.卫生研究、服务、教育及政策中的多学科性、跨学科性和超学科性：3. 学科、学科间距离与学科选择
Clin Invest Med. 2008;31(1):E41-8. doi: 10.25011/cim.v31i1.3140.
6
Innovation Strategies and Health System Guiding Principles to Address Equity and Sustainability in Responsible Innovation in Health Comment on "What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address? Insights From an International Scoping Review".创新策略和卫生系统指导原则，以解决负责任的卫生创新中的公平性和可持续性问题 评“负责任的卫生创新应解决哪些卫生系统挑战？国际范围审查的见解”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Sep 1;8(9):570-572. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.50.
7
Aligning sustainability assessment with responsible research and innovation: Towards a framework for Constructive Sustainability Assessment.将可持续性评估与负责任的研究和创新相结合：迈向建设性可持续性评估框架。
Sustain Prod Consum. 2019 Oct;20:58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2019.05.002.
8
Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach.开发基于证据的项目可持续性培训课程：一种群组随机、多阶段方法。
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 26;13(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0819-5.
9
Spillover Benefits and Achieving Sustainability of Age-Friendly Communities.溢出效益与实现老年友好社区的可持续性。
Gerontologist. 2022 Jan 14;62(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab060.
10
Health promotion and food insecurity: Exploring environmental sustainability principles to guide practice within Australia.促进健康与粮食不安全：探索环境可持续性原则以指导澳大利亚的实践。
Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Jan;31(1):68-76. doi: 10.1002/hpja.249. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
引用本文的文献
1
How is who: evidence as clues for action in participatory sustainability science and public health research.谁如何：参与式可持续性科学和公共卫生研究中作为行动线索的证据。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2024 Jan 9;46(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s40656-023-00603-5.
2
Finding patterns in policy questions.发现政策问题中的模式。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 22;12(1):20126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21830-z.
3
Creating Synergies between Citizen Science and Indigenous and Local Knowledge.在公民科学与本土及地方知识之间创造协同效应。
Bioscience. 2021 Apr 28;71(5):503-518. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab023. eCollection 2021 May.
4
The Concept, Practice, Application, and Results of Locally Based Monitoring of the Environment.基于本地的环境监测的概念、实践、应用及结果
Bioscience. 2021 Apr 28;71(5):484-502. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab021. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Holistic approach to assess co-benefits of local climate mitigation in a hot humid region of Australia.整体方法评估澳大利亚湿热地区地方气候缓解的共同效益。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 26;10(1):14216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71148-x.
本文引用的文献
1
Robust research needs many lines of evidence.强有力的研究需要多方面的证据。
Nature. 2018 Jan 25;553(7689):399-401. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-01023-3.
2
GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health.GRADE：评估环境与职业健康领域的证据质量。
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:611-6. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
3
Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management.利用认知作为证据来改善保护和环境管理。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):582-92. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12681. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis.决策与风险分析中的认知与动机偏差
Risk Anal. 2015 Jul;35(7):1230-51. doi: 10.1111/risa.12360. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
5
Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments.基于文献的环境卫生科学评估的系统评价与证据整合。
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Jul;122(7):711-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307972. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
6
The need for evidence-based conservation.基于证据的保护的必要性。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jun;19(6):305-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018.
Zotero 插件