Texas State University, San Marcos, USA.
The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):NP13314-NP13336. doi: 10.1177/0886260519900293. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
The aims of this study were to (a) evaluate undergraduate men's ( = 108) judgments of the effectiveness of women's responses to increasingly coercive sexual victimization risk and nonsexual social situations and (b) examine whether individual difference factors (e.g., perceptions of attractiveness, rape empathy) influenced these judgments. As part of a larger study, undergraduate women were video recorded responding to a series of vignettes depicting increasingly coercive sexual and nonsexual social situations. Undergraduate men then rated the effectiveness of these responses in either decreasing risk for sexual victimization (for the sexual victimization risk situations) or increasing the likelihood of achieving a social goal (for the nonsexual social situations), as well as each woman's physical attractiveness. Multilevel modeling results revealed that both situational-level (i.e., level of coercion) and individual-level factors (i.e., rape empathy, perceived attractiveness of the women, and rape myth acceptance) were associated with men's judgments of the effectiveness of women's responses in sexually risky situations. Specifically, responses were rated as less effective in decreasing victimization risk as the level of coercion increased, and men who reported lower rape empathy, lower perceived attractiveness of the woman, and higher rape myth acceptance judged women's responses as less effective than men who reported higher rape empathy, higher perceived attractiveness, and lower rape myth acceptance. Attractiveness was the only significant predictor of men's judgments of women's responses to nonsexual situations, with more attractive women being perceived as more effective. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of understanding the interaction between individual difference variables and situational features in understanding men's judgments of women's responses.
(a) 评估本科男生（n = 108）对女性应对逐渐增强的性侵犯风险和非性社交情境的有效性的判断；(b) 考察个体差异因素（如吸引力感知、强奸同理心）是否影响这些判断。作为一项更大研究的一部分，本科女生被录像记录了对一系列描述逐渐增强的性侵犯和非性社交情境的情境片段的反应。然后，本科男生对这些反应在降低性侵犯风险（针对性侵犯风险情境）或增加实现社交目标的可能性（针对非性社交情境）方面的有效性进行了评估，同时还评估了每个女性的外貌吸引力。多层次模型的结果表明，情境层面（即胁迫程度）和个体层面的因素（即强奸同理心、对女性的吸引力感知和强奸神话接受程度）都与男性对女性在性风险情境中的反应有效性的判断有关。具体来说，随着胁迫程度的增加，反应被评为降低受害风险的效果越差，而报告强奸同理心较低、对女性吸引力感知较低和强奸神话接受程度较高的男性则认为女性的反应不如报告强奸同理心较高、对女性吸引力感知较高和强奸神话接受程度较低的男性有效。吸引力是男性对女性对非性情境反应判断的唯一显著预测因素，更有吸引力的女性被认为更有效。本研究的结果强调了理解个体差异变量和情境特征之间相互作用对于理解男性对女性反应判断的重要性。
