Psychology Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 May;31(4):621-666. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1722714. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
This systematic review identified empirically supported evidence of effective cognitive intervention for children with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) and included clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for intervention of attention, memory and executive functioning. Databases included: PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE; PubMed; PsycINFO; PSYCHextra; Ovid; PsychBite; CINAHL and EMBASE. Abstracts and full text articles were reviewed by two independent authors. Articles reporting on a cognitive intervention for children aged 4-19 years with a primary diagnosis of ABI were included. 25 articles were identified by both reviewers (1 00% inter-rater agreement), with the last search conducted in June 201 9. Articles were assigned to one of four categories of primary intervention: (1) Attention and Memory; (2) Executive Functioning; (3) Attention, Memory, and Executive Functioning or (4) Multi-Model Comprehensive Combined Approaches. Articles were critically appraised and level of evidence was determined according to established quality methodology criteria. Of the 25 articles evaluated, nine articles were rated Class 1, eight Class 11, and nine Class 111. One practice standard and one practice option was provided. Key suggestions included using more homogeneous samples in terms of age and injury characteristics (e.g., nature and severity of ABI, age at ABI) and incorporating long-term monitoring of outcome. Interventionalists must consider the dynamic nature of brain and cognitive development and the changing environmental needs of children.
这篇系统评价确定了针对获得性脑损伤 (ABI) 儿童的有效认知干预的实证支持证据,包括注意力、记忆和执行功能干预的临床实践指南和建议。数据库包括:PsycARTICLES;MEDLINE;PubMed;PsycINFO;PSYCHextra;Ovid;PsychBite;CINAHL 和 EMBASE。两位独立作者对摘要和全文文章进行了审查。纳入了报告针对主要诊断为 ABI 的 4-19 岁儿童的认知干预的文章。两位审稿人共确定了 25 篇文章(100%的组内一致性),最后一次搜索于 2019 年 6 月进行。文章分为以下四类主要干预措施之一:(1)注意力和记忆;(2)执行功能;(3)注意力、记忆和执行功能或(4)多模式综合联合方法。对文章进行了批判性评估,并根据既定的质量方法标准确定了证据水平。在所评估的 25 篇文章中,有 9 篇被评为 1 级,8 篇为 11 级,9 篇为 111 级。提供了一个实践标准和一个实践选择。主要建议包括根据年龄和损伤特征(例如,ABI 的性质和严重程度、ABI 时的年龄)使用更同质的样本,并纳入对结果的长期监测。干预者必须考虑大脑和认知发展的动态性质以及儿童不断变化的环境需求。