Silent Spring Institute, Newton, MA, USA.
Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Dec;15(5):425-442. doi: 10.1177/1556264620903595. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
Little is known about the willingness of prospective study participants to share environmental health data. To fill this gap, we conducted a hypothetical vignette survey among 1,575 women who have volunteered to be contacted about breast cancer studies. Eighty-three percent were interested in participating in the environmental studies, with little difference whether data were restricted to the research team, shared with approved researchers, or publicly accessible. However, participants somewhat preferred controlled access for children's data. Respondents were more interested in studies with environmental rather than biological samples and more interested when researchers would return personal results, a practice of increasing importance. They were more reluctant to share location or to participate if studies involved electronic medical records. Many expressed concerns about privacy, particularly security breaches, but reidentification risks were mentioned infrequently, indicating that this topic should be discussed during informed consent.
关于潜在研究参与者分享环境健康数据的意愿,人们知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们在 1575 名自愿参与乳腺癌研究的女性中进行了一项假设情景调查。83%的人有兴趣参与环境研究,无论数据仅限于研究团队、与已批准的研究人员共享还是公开获取,差异都不大。然而,参与者对儿童数据的受控访问略有偏好。受访者对环境样本而非生物样本的研究更感兴趣,当研究人员返回个人结果时,他们更感兴趣,这种做法越来越重要。如果研究涉及电子病历,他们就不太愿意分享位置或参与。许多人对隐私表示担忧,特别是数据泄露,但很少有人提到重新识别风险,这表明在知情同意过程中应该讨论这个话题。