Suppr超能文献

EQ-5D 与 SF-6D 的可互换性,以及它们在西班牙脊柱术后人群中的心理测量特性比较。

Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.

机构信息

Department of Applied Economy, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales de Albacete, Universidad de Castilla La-Mancha, Pza. De la Universidad, 1, 02071, Albacete, Spain.

Department of Neurosurgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):649-662. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01161-4. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Short-Form Six-Dimensions (SF-6D) are widely used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years in cost-utility analysis. The choice of the instrument could influence the results of cost-utility analysis. Our objective was to compare the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D and SF-6D in a postoperative Spanish population, as well as assess their interchangeability in a cost-utility analysis.

DESIGN

Ambispective study.

SETTING

Tertiary public hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

275 Spanish patients who had undergone surgery for lumbar disc herniation.

INTERVENTION(S): Patients completed EQ-5D-3L and Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) questionnaires. Internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, agreement, and construct validity (convergent validity, including dimension-to-dimension correlations, and "known groups" validity) were assessed. The Spanish tariffs were applied.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cronbach's α coefficient, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

Main findings were: (a) lack of agreement between EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient: 0.664 [95% CI: 0.600-0.720]; the Bland-Altman plot showed a mean difference of 0.0835 and wide limits of agreement [- 0.2602-0.4272]). (b) Lack of correlation between domains that theoretically measure similar aspects of quality of life, with the exception of "pain" domain.

CONCLUSIONS

The preference-based EQ-5D and SF-6D instruments showed valid psychometric properties to assess generic outcome in a Spanish population who had undergone surgery for lumbar disc herniation; however, utility scores derived from the measures were different. Thus, these two instruments cannot be used interchangeably to perform a cost-utility analysis, and they should both be included in sensitivity analyses.

摘要

目的

EuroQol-5D(EQ-5D)和简短六维度(SF-6D)被广泛用于成本效用分析中计算质量调整生命年。工具的选择可能会影响成本效用分析的结果。我们的目的是比较 EQ-5D 和 SF-6D 在西班牙术后人群中的心理测量特性,并评估它们在成本效用分析中的可互换性。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

三级公立医院。

参与者

275 名接受腰椎间盘突出症手术的西班牙患者。

干预措施

患者完成 EQ-5D-3L 和简短 36 项(SF-36v2)问卷。评估内部一致性、地板和天花板效应、一致性和结构有效性(收敛有效性,包括维度-维度相关性和“已知组”有效性)。应用西班牙关税。

主要测量指标

Cronbach's α 系数、Spearman 秩相关系数、Lin 的一致性相关系数、组内相关系数和 Bland-Altman 图。

结果

主要发现为:(a)EQ-5D 和 SF-6D 效用之间缺乏一致性(Lin 的一致性相关系数:0.664 [95%置信区间:0.600-0.720];Bland-Altman 图显示平均差异为 0.0835,一致性范围较宽[-0.2602-0.4272])。(b)理论上衡量生活质量相似方面的领域之间缺乏相关性,除了“疼痛”领域。

结论

偏好的 EQ-5D 和 SF-6D 工具在接受腰椎间盘突出症手术的西班牙人群中评估通用结局具有有效的心理测量特性;然而,从这些措施中得出的效用得分是不同的。因此,这两种仪器不能互换使用进行成本效用分析,并且都应包括在敏感性分析中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验