Suppr超能文献

考察短式 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理幸福感量表(SWEMWBS)与 EQ-5D-5L 之间的关系,并比较其心理测量特性。

Examining the relationship between the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) and EQ-5D-5L and comparing their psychometric properties.

机构信息

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Tianhe Foreign Language School, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Mar 16;21(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02108-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) and EQ-5D-5L and compare their psychometric properties in 4 chronic conditions in China.

METHODS

Participants were invited to complete the online survey. Spearman's rank correlation was used to evaluate the correlation between SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L; exploratory factor analysis was used to ascertain the number of unique underlying latent factors measured by SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L. Next, we assessed the psychometric properties of SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L by reporting distributions and examining their known-group validity and convergent validity.

RESULTS

In total, 500 individuals participated the online survey. Spearman's rank correlation showed that EQ-5D-5L dimensions, except for the anxiety/depression dimension, were weakly correlated with all dimensions of SWEMWBS. The two-factor solution for exploratory factor analysis found that all of SWEMWBS dimensions loaded onto one factor, four EQ-5D-5L dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities and pain/discomfort) onto another, and the EQ-5D-5L item of anxiety/depression item loaded moderately onto both factors. Patients of four disease groups had different distributions of responses for both SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L. In terms of known-group validity, both the F statistic and AUROC value of EQ-5D-5L utility scores were significantly higher than SWEMWBS scores in all four pair-wised comparisons. The Pearson correlation coefficient between EQ-5D-5L utility scores, SWEMWBS scores and EQ-VAS was 0.44 (P < 0.01) and 0.65 (P < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L measure different constructs and can be seen as complementary measures. Both measures demonstrated good convergent validity and known-group validity with EQ-5D-5L being a more sensitive measure, even for mental conditions.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨短版华威-爱丁堡心理健康量表(SWEMWBS)与 EQ-5D-5L 之间的关系,并比较它们在中国四种慢性疾病中的心理测量特性。

方法

邀请参与者完成在线调查。采用斯皮尔曼等级相关分析评估 SWEMWBS 与 EQ-5D-5L 之间的相关性;采用探索性因子分析确定 SWEMWBS 和 EQ-5D-5L 所测量的独特潜在因素数量。接下来,我们通过报告分布并检查其已知组有效性和收敛有效性来评估 SWEMWBS 和 EQ-5D-5L 的心理测量特性。

结果

共有 500 人参加了在线调查。斯皮尔曼等级相关分析显示,EQ-5D-5L 维度,除焦虑/抑郁维度外,与 SWEMWBS 的所有维度均呈弱相关。探索性因子分析的两因素解决方案发现,SWEMWBS 的所有维度都加载到一个因子上,EQ-5D-5L 的四个维度(移动性、自我护理、日常活动和疼痛/不适)加载到另一个因子上,而 EQ-5D-5L 的焦虑/抑郁项目适度加载到两个因子上。四种疾病组的患者对 SWEMWBS 和 EQ-5D-5L 的反应分布均不同。在已知组有效性方面,EQ-5D-5L 效用评分的 F 统计量和 AUROC 值在所有四种两两比较中均显著高于 SWEMWBS 评分。EQ-5D-5L 效用评分、SWEMWBS 评分和 EQ-VAS 之间的皮尔逊相关系数分别为 0.44(P<0.01)和 0.65(P<0.01)。

结论

SWEMWBS 和 EQ-5D-5L 测量不同的结构,可以视为互补的测量方法。两种方法均表现出良好的收敛有效性和已知组有效性,EQ-5D-5L 是一种更敏感的测量方法,即使对于心理状况也是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e4/10018827/165069e2af82/12955_2023_2108_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验