Suppr超能文献

子宫切除术后早期与延迟拔除尿管:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Early versus delayed urinary catheter removal after hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Rimmer Michael P, Henderson Ian, Keay Stephen D, Khan Khalid S, Al Wattar Bassel H

机构信息

MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh BioQuarter, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Coventry, UK; University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Apr;247:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In bladder drainage, an essential part of post-hysterectomy care, the optimal timing for removing the urinary catheter is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the risks and benefits of early (<6 h) vs delayed (>6 h) catheter removal post-hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception till May 2019 for randomised trials of women undergoing hysterectomy. We reported on urinary retention, positive urine culture, urinary tract infection (UTI) (defined by symptoms and/or antibiotic use), post-operative pyrexia, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay. We assessed risk of bias in included trials and used a random-effect model to generate risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Of 1020 potentially relevant citations, we included 10 randomised trials (1120 women). Four trials had low risk of bias for randomisation and allocation concealment while five had low risk for outcome assessment and selective reporting. Compared to delayed removal, women in the early catheter removal group had a higher risk of urinary retention and needing re-catheterisation (10 RCTs, RR 3.61, 95 %CI 1.21-9.21, I = 56 %). There was some reduction in the risk of post-operative UTI (6 RCTs, RR 0.42, 95 %CI 0.18 to 0.96, I = 0 %), but we did not find a significant difference in post-operative pyrexia (6 RCTs, RR 0.73, 95 %CI 0.43-1.24, I = 18 %) or positive urine cultures (6 RCTs, RR of 0.56, 95 %CI 0.27-1.12, I = 55 %). There was no significant difference in the average time to ambulation (3RCTs, WMD -4.6, 95 %CI -9.16 to -0.18, I = 98 %) and length of hospital stay (3RCTs, WMD -1.05, 95 %CI -2.42 to 0.31, I = 98 %). Our meta-regression on the provision of prophylactic antibiotics did not show a significant effect on the reported outcomes. Our analysis was limited by our inability to adjust for potential effect modifiers such as the surgical route.

CONCLUSIONS

Early removal of the urinary catheter <6 h post-hysterectomy seems to increase the risk of urinary retention and needing re-catheterisation, but may reduce post-operative UTI.

摘要

目的

在子宫切除术后护理的重要组成部分膀胱引流中,拔除导尿管的最佳时机尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估子宫切除术后早期(<6小时)与延迟(>6小时)拔除导尿管的风险和益处。

研究设计

一项系统评价,检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库,从建库至2019年5月,查找接受子宫切除术女性的随机试验。我们报告了尿潴留、尿培养阳性、尿路感染(UTI)(根据症状和/或抗生素使用情况定义)、术后发热、下床活动时间和住院时间。我们评估了纳入试验的偏倚风险,并使用随机效应模型生成二分结局的风险比(RR)和连续结局的加权平均差(WMD),以及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在1020条潜在相关文献中,我们纳入了10项随机试验(1120名女性)。4项试验在随机分组和分配隐藏方面偏倚风险较低,5项试验在结局评估和选择性报告方面偏倚风险较低。与延迟拔除相比,早期拔除导尿管组的女性发生尿潴留和需要重新插管的风险更高(10项随机对照试验,RR 3.61,95%CI 1.21 - 9.21,I² = 56%)。术后UTI的风险有所降低(6项随机对照试验,RR 0.42,95%CI 0.18至0.96,I² = 0%),但我们未发现术后发热(6项随机对照试验,RR 0.73,95%CI 0.43 - 1.24,I² = 18%)或尿培养阳性(6项随机对照试验,RR 0.56,95%CI 0.27 - 1.12,I² = 55%)有显著差异。下床活动的平均时间(3项随机对照试验,WMD -4.6,95%CI -9.16至 -0.18,I² = 98%)和住院时间(3项随机对照试验,WMD -1.05,95%CI -2.42至0.31,I² = 98%)无显著差异。我们对预防性使用抗生素的Meta回归分析未显示对报告结局有显著影响。我们的分析受到无法调整潜在效应修饰因素(如手术途径)的限制。

结论

子宫切除术后<6小时早期拔除导尿管似乎会增加尿潴留和需要重新插管的风险,但可能会降低术后UTI的发生风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验