Suppr超能文献

黎巴嫩早产儿样本中芬顿法与共生长 21 图表的比较研究。

Comparative study between Fenton and intergrowth 21 charts in a sample of Lebanese premature babies.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (USEK), Jounieh, Lebanon.

Pediatrics Department, Notre Dame Des Secours University Hospital, Byblos, Lebanon.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1968-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different charts are used to assess premature growth. The Fenton chart, based on prenatal growth, has been used in the neonates' intensive care unit (NICU) of the Notre Dame des Secours University Hospital to assess premature newborns' development. Intergrowth21 is a new multidisciplinary, multiethnic growth chart better adapted to premature growth. Our objective was to compare both charts Fenton and Intergrowth21 in order to implement Intergrowth in our unit.

METHODS

We analyzed 318 files of premature babies born who were admitted to the NICU from 2010 till 2017. Anthropometric data (weight, height and head circumference) converted to percentiles was filled on both charts from birth till 1 month of age.

RESULTS

The results of the linear regression, taking the weight at birth as the dependent variable, showed that the Fenton scale (R2 = 0.391) would predict the weight at birth better than the Intergrowth 21 scale (R2 = 0.257). The same applies for height and cranial perimeter at birth when taken as dependent variables. When considering the weight and height at 2 weeks, the results showed that the Intergrowth 21 scale would predict those variables better than the Fenton scale, with higher R2 values higher in favor of the Intergrowth 21 scale for both weight (0.384 vs 0.311) and height (0.650 vs 0.585). At 4 weeks, the results showed that the Fenton scale would predict weight (R2 = 0.655 vs 0.631) and height (R2 = 0.710 vs 0.643) better than the Intergrowth 21 scale. The results obtained were adjusted over the newborns' sociodemographic and clinical factors.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study are controversial where the Fenton growth charts are superior to Intergrowth 21 before 2 weeks of age and at 4 weeks, whereas Intergrowth 21 charts showed higher percentiles for weight and height than Fenton charts at 2 two weeks of age. Further studies following a different design, such as a clinical trial or a prospective study, taking multiple ethnicities into account and conducted in multiple centers should be considered to enroll a more representative sample of Lebanese children and be able to extrapolate our results to the national level.

摘要

背景

有不同的图表用于评估早产儿的生长情况。基于产前生长情况的 Fenton 图表,被 Notre-Dame des Secours 大学医院的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)用于评估早产新生儿的发育情况。Intergrowth21 是一种新的多学科、多民族的生长图表,更适合评估早产儿的生长情况。我们的目标是比较 Fenton 图表和 Intergrowth21 图表,以便在我们的单位中实施 Intergrowth。

方法

我们分析了 2010 年至 2017 年间在 NICU 住院的 318 名早产儿的病历。将体重、身高和头围等人体测量数据转换为百分位数,分别填写在 Fenton 图表和 Intergrowth21 图表上,从出生到 1 个月大。

结果

以出生体重为因变量的线性回归结果表明,Fenton 量表(R2=0.391)比 Intergrowth21 量表(R2=0.257)更能预测出生体重。出生时的身高和头围也同样适用。当考虑到 2 周时的体重和身高时,结果表明,Intergrowth21 量表会比 Fenton 量表更好地预测这些变量,Intergrowth21 量表的 R2 值更高,更有利于 Intergrowth21 量表,体重的 R2 值为 0.384,高于 Fenton 量表的 0.311,身高的 R2 值为 0.650,高于 Fenton 量表的 0.585。4 周时,Fenton 量表预测体重(R2=0.655 比 0.631)和身高(R2=0.710 比 0.643)的效果优于 Intergrowth21 量表。研究结果在调整了新生儿的社会人口学和临床因素后得出。

结论

我们的研究结果存在争议,在 2 周龄之前和 4 周龄时,Fenton 生长图表优于 Intergrowth21 图表,而在 2 周龄时,Intergrowth21 图表的体重和身高百分位数高于 Fenton 图表。应考虑设计不同的研究,如临床试验或前瞻性研究,考虑多种族,并在多个中心进行,以招募更具代表性的黎巴嫩儿童样本,并能够将我们的研究结果推广到全国范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e89e/7025416/f3d7f77fc47d/12887_2020_1968_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验