• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济资源与酒精使用障碍患者的生活质量:社会支持和抑郁的中介作用。

Socioeconomic resources and quality of life in alcohol use disorder patients: the mediating effects of social support and depression.

机构信息

Department of Social Welfare, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heuksuk-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Chung-ju, South Korea.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Feb 17;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00258-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13011-020-00258-6
PMID:32066483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7027081/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QoL) has recently attracted increased attention as a major indicator of the recovery from alcohol use disorder (AUD). This study investigated the mediating effects of social support and depression for the relationship between socioeconomic resources and QoL among people with AUD in South Korea.

METHODS

Patients across South Korea who had been diagnosed with AUD in the previous year (n = 404) and were registered at hospitals and addiction management centers were surveyed. The participants ranged in age from 19 to 65 years. Structural equation modeling was performed, using stable residence, income, stable employment, social support, depression, and QoL as predictors. Bootstrapping analysis was performed to test for mediating effects.

RESULTS

The socioeconomic resources income (β = .297, p < .001), stable employment (β = .131, p < .01), and stable residence (β = .091, p < .05) showed statistically significant and positive relationships with social support. However, none of these were significantly related to depression. Social support showed a significant and negative relationship with depression (β = -.172, p < .001). Income positively and directly influenced QoL (β = .148, p < .001). All three socioeconomic resources indirectly influenced depression through social support, which, in turn, influenced QoL. This suggests that socioeconomic resources directly influence QoL and indirectly influence it through social support.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that social support has an important role in improving the QoL of people with AUD. Furthermore, socioeconomic resources, such as having a stable residence, employment, and income, are necessary for recovery from alcohol addiction.

摘要

背景

生活质量(QoL)最近作为酒精使用障碍(AUD)康复的主要指标受到越来越多的关注。本研究调查了社会支持和抑郁在韩国 AUD 患者的社会经济资源与生活质量之间关系中的中介作用。

方法

在韩国,对过去一年被诊断患有 AUD 的患者(n=404)在医院和成瘾管理中心进行了调查。参与者年龄在 19 至 65 岁之间。使用稳定的住所、收入、稳定的就业、社会支持、抑郁和生活质量作为预测因素进行结构方程建模。采用 bootstrap 分析检验中介效应。

结果

社会经济资源收入(β=0.297,p<0.001)、稳定就业(β=0.131,p<0.01)和稳定居住(β=0.091,p<0.05)与社会支持呈显著正相关。然而,这些都与抑郁没有显著关系。社会支持与抑郁呈显著负相关(β=-0.172,p<0.001)。收入与生活质量呈显著正相关(β=0.148,p<0.001)。所有三种社会经济资源都通过社会支持间接地影响抑郁,而抑郁又反过来影响生活质量。这表明社会经济资源直接影响生活质量,通过社会支持间接影响生活质量。

结论

这些发现表明,社会支持在改善 AUD 患者的生活质量方面起着重要作用。此外,稳定的住所、就业和收入等社会经济资源对于戒除酒精成瘾是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24b2/7027081/92bfe18a2801/13011_2020_258_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24b2/7027081/92bfe18a2801/13011_2020_258_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24b2/7027081/92bfe18a2801/13011_2020_258_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic resources and quality of life in alcohol use disorder patients: the mediating effects of social support and depression.社会经济资源与酒精使用障碍患者的生活质量:社会支持和抑郁的中介作用。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Feb 17;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00258-6.
2
Socioeconomic position and quality of life among older people: The mediating role of social support.社会经济地位与老年人的生活质量:社会支持的中介作用。
Prev Med. 2020 Jun;135:106073. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106073. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
3
A structural model for quality of life of alcoholics.酒精依赖者生活质量的结构模型。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jul;76(7):1658-1667. doi: 10.1111/jan.14378. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
4
[Factors Influencing Quality of Life of Alcoholics Anonymous Members in Korea].[影响韩国匿名戒酒互助会成员生活质量的因素]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016 Apr;46(2):305-14. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.2.305.
5
Recovery community centers: Characteristics of new attendees and longitudinal investigation of the predictors and effects of participation.康复社区中心:新参与者的特征以及参与的预测因素和效果的纵向调查。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 May;124:108287. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108287. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
Mediating effects of social support on depression and quality of life among patients with HIV infection in Taiwan.社会支持对台湾地区HIV感染患者抑郁及生活质量的中介作用
AIDS Care. 2014;26(8):996-1003. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2013.873764. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
7
Impact of perceived social support on the mental health and health-related quality of life in cancer patients: results from a nationwide, multicenter survey in South Korea.感知到的社会支持对癌症患者心理健康和健康相关生活质量的影响:来自韩国全国多中心调查的结果。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1283-90. doi: 10.1002/pon.3133. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
8
Association of quality of life with major depressive disorder among people with HIV in South India.印度南部HIV感染者中生活质量与重度抑郁症的关联
AIDS Care. 2013;25(2):169-72. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.689809. Epub 2012 May 29.
9
Depression, social support, and stigma as predictors of quality of life over time: results from an Asha-based HIV/AIDS intervention in India.抑郁、社会支持及耻辱感对生活质量随时间变化的预测作用:印度一项基于阿莎志愿者的HIV/AIDS干预研究结果
AIDS Care. 2019 May;31(5):563-571. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1563281. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
10
Socioeconomic position and depression in South African adults with long-term health conditions: a longitudinal study of causal pathways.社会经济地位与南非长期健康状况成年人的抑郁:因果途径的纵向研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr;28(2):199-209. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000427. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of reintegration, relapse, and readmission: a qualitative study among patients with alcohol use disorder in Uganda.重新融入、复发和再次入院的经历:乌干达酒精使用障碍患者的定性研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;13:1612634. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612634. eCollection 2025.
2
Biopsychosocial Profile of Chronic Alcohol Users: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study.慢性酒精使用者的生物心理社会概况:一项横断面研究的见解
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 10;15(7):741. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070741.
3
Oxytocin as a treatment for alcohol use disorder and heavy drinking: A narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Transitions in and out of alcohol use disorders: their associations with conditional changes in quality of life over a 3-year follow-up interval.酒精使用障碍的转入和转出:它们与3年随访期内生活质量的条件性变化的关联。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2009 Jan-Feb;44(1):84-92. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agn094. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
2
Recovery in pathological gambling: an imprecise concept.病理性赌博的康复:一个不精确的概念。
Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(12-13):1844-64. doi: 10.1080/10826080802285810.
3
Quality of life, depression and anxiety in alcohol dependence.
催产素用于治疗酒精使用障碍和重度饮酒:一项叙述性综述。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Dec;32(6):625-638. doi: 10.1037/pha0000741. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
Agreement for Recovery: First Spanish Consensus on the Concept of Alcohol Addiction Recovery.《康复协议:西班牙首个关于酒精成瘾康复概念的共识》。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2024 Aug;52(4):382-393. doi: 10.62641/aep.v52i4.1633.
5
Drinking behavior patterns may be associated with persistent depressive symptoms after alcohol abstinence in alcohol use disorder.饮酒行为模式可能与酒精使用障碍患者戒酒后面临持续性抑郁症状相关。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2024 Jun;44(2):381-388. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12429. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
6
Evaluating the Aspects of Quality of Life in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review Based on the WHOQOL Questionnaire.评估物质使用障碍患者的生活质量方面:基于世界卫生组织生活质量问卷的系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 28;16:4265-4278. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S440764. eCollection 2023.
7
Worsening of alcohol abuse disorder in a Spanish population during the first twelve months of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors: retrospective, ecological and community study.COVID-19 大流行期间西班牙人群酒精滥用障碍恶化及其相关因素的回顾性、生态学和社区研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04993-5.
8
Multidimensional Quality of Life Across the Spectrum of Alcohol Use Behavior.饮酒行为全谱中的多维生活质量
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2022 Nov 28;4(4):92-101. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20220023. eCollection 2022 Winter.
9
Quality of life and prosocial or antisocial coping with resource deprivation: A cross-sectional study of people at risk of social exclusion.生活质量与资源匮乏时的亲社会或反社会应对方式:社会排斥风险人群的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0275234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275234. eCollection 2022.
10
Quality of life and associated factors among the youth with substance use in Northwest Ethiopia: Using structural equation modeling.埃塞俄比亚西北部物质使用青年的生活质量及其相关因素:结构方程模型的应用。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 20;17(9):e0274768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274768. eCollection 2022.
酒精依赖患者的生活质量、抑郁与焦虑
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 Jan;27(1):83-90. doi: 10.1080/09595230701711140.
4
Alcohol-related suicides in victims with a history of hospital-treated depression.有医院治疗抑郁症病史的受害者中与酒精相关的自杀行为。
Am J Addict. 2005 Oct-Dec;14(5):455-63. doi: 10.1080/10550490500247131.
5
Quality of life as an outcome measure in alcoholism treatment research.生活质量作为酒精中毒治疗研究中的一项结果指标。
J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2005 Jul(15):119-39; discussion 92-3. doi: 10.15288/jsas.2005.s15.119.
6
Health-related quality of life for adults participating in outpatient substance abuse treatment.参与门诊药物滥用治疗的成年人的健康相关生活质量。
Am J Addict. 2003 May-Jun;12(3):198-210.
7
Application of a quality of life measure, the life situation survey (LSS), to alcohol-dependent subjects in relapse and remission.将生活质量测量工具——生活状况调查(LSS)应用于处于复发和缓解期的酒精依赖受试者。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Nov;24(11):1687-92.
8
The impact of sociodemographics, comorbidity and symptom recency on health-related quality of life in alcoholics.社会人口统计学、合并症及症状近期情况对酗酒者健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Stud Alcohol. 1999 Sep;60(5):653-62. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.653.
9
Quality of life in alcohol-dependent subjects--a review.酒精依赖者的生活质量——综述
Qual Life Res. 1999 May;8(3):255-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1008802711478.
10
Social support, type A behavior, and coronary artery disease.社会支持、A型行为与冠状动脉疾病。
Psychosom Med. 1987 Jul-Aug;49(4):331-40. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198707000-00002.