Suppr超能文献

非小细胞肺癌患者 PD-1 抑制剂治疗后与单纯化疗相比的倾向性评分加权分析(WJOG10217L)。

Propensity score-weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L).

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.

Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan

出版信息

J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000350.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested that chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors may confer an improved response for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, potential selection bias in such studies has not been addressed. We therefore applied propensity score analysis to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitor treatment (CAP) compared with chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study for patients treated at 47 institutions across Japan between April 1, 2014 and July 31, 2017. Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent NSCLC who have undergone chemotherapy. Patients subsequently treated with chemotherapy (docetaxel with or without ramucirumab, S-1 or pemetrexed) either after PD-1 inhibitor therapy (CAP cohort) or alone (control cohort) were included. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 1439 patients (243 and 1196 in the CAP and control cohorts, respectively) was available for unadjusted analysis. Several baseline characteristics-including age, histology, or genetic alterations, and brain metastasis-differed significantly between the two cohorts. After adjustment for patient characteristics with the IPW method, ORR was 18.9% for the CAP cohort and 11.0% for the control cohort (ORR ratio 1.71; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.46; p=0.004). IPW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median progression-free survival (PFS) for the CAP and control cohorts was 2.8 and 2.7 months (IPW-adjusted HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.12; p=0.55), and median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 and 10.4 months (IPW-adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.28; p=0.63), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

After accounting for selection bias by propensity score analysis, CAP showed a significantly higher ORR compared with chemotherapy alone, with the primary end point of ORR being achieved. However, these results did not translate into a PFS or OS advantage, suggesting that prior administration of PD-1 inhibitors may result in a synergistic antitumor effect with subsequent chemotherapy, but that such an effect is transient. CAP therefore does not appear to achieve durable tumor control or confer a lasting survival benefit.

摘要

背景

研究表明,免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后进行化疗可能会改善非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的反应。然而,此类研究中的潜在选择偏差尚未得到解决。因此,我们应用倾向评分分析来研究 PD-1 抑制剂治疗后(CAP)化疗与单独化疗相比的疗效。

方法

我们对 2014 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 7 月 31 日在日本 47 家机构接受治疗的患者进行了回顾性观察性队列研究。符合条件的患者为接受过化疗的晚期或复发性 NSCLC 患者。随后接受化疗(多西他赛联合或不联合 ramucirumab、S-1 或培美曲塞)的患者,要么是在 PD-1 抑制剂治疗后(CAP 队列),要么是单独治疗(对照组)。主要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)。应用逆概率加权(IPW)调整潜在混杂因素。

结果

共有 1439 名患者(CAP 队列和对照组分别为 243 名和 1196 名)可进行未调整分析。两组之间的一些基线特征,包括年龄、组织学或遗传改变以及脑转移,差异显著。通过 IPW 方法调整患者特征后,CAP 队列的 ORR 为 18.9%,对照组为 11.0%(ORR 比值 1.71;95%CI 1.19 至 2.46;p=0.004)。IPW 调整后的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,CAP 队列和对照组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 2.8 个月和 2.7 个月(IPW 调整后的 HR 0.95;95%CI 0.80 至 1.12;p=0.55),中位总生存期(OS)分别为 9.2 个月和 10.4 个月(IPW 调整后的 HR 1.05;95%CI 0.86 至 1.28;p=0.63)。

结论

通过倾向评分分析考虑选择偏差后,与单独化疗相比,CAP 显示出更高的 ORR,主要终点 ORR 达到。然而,这些结果并未转化为 PFS 或 OS 优势,这表明 PD-1 抑制剂的预先给药可能与随后的化疗产生协同抗肿瘤作用,但这种作用是短暂的。因此,CAP 似乎无法实现持久的肿瘤控制或带来持久的生存获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f745/7057433/2df028b243db/jitc-2019-000350f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验