Lin Qiao-Xin, Song Wen-Wen, Xie Wen-Xia, Deng Yi-Ting, Gong Yan-Na, Liu Yi-Ru, Tian Yi, Zhao Wen-Ya, Tian Ling, Gu Dian-Na
Department of Medical Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Central Laboratory, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Neoplasia. 2025 Jan;59:101077. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2024.101077. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
Anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy are currently important treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. However, the combined use of the two therapies is controversial, and few studies have investigated the effects of different time sequences of the two therapies on treatment outcomes.
The tumor-bearing mouse model was established and the mice were divided into four groups, including AA-ICB sequence group, ICB-AA sequence group, synchronization group and the control group. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess tumor microvessels and PD-L1 expression. Selected immune cell populations were evaluated using flow cytometry. Meta-analysis and clinical information were used to elucidate the clinical effects of administration sequence.
We found that anti-PD-L1 treatment followed by anti-VEGFR2 therapy exerts the best inhibitory effect on tumor growth. Different sequences of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy resulted in different proportions of tumor microvessels and immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment. We further revealed that the administration of anti-PD-L1 before anti-VEGFR brought more normalized tumor blood vessels and CD8T cell infiltration and reduced immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. Subsequent re-transplantation experiments confirmed the long-term benefits of this treatment strategy. The meta-analysis reinforced that immunotherapy prior to anti-angiogenic therapy or combination therapy have better therapeutic effects in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Our study demonstrated that the therapeutic effect of anti-angiogenic treatment after immune checkpoint therapy was superior to that of concurrent therapy, whereas anti-angiogenic therapy followed by immunotherapy did not bring more significant clinical benefits than independent monotherapy.
抗血管生成疗法和免疫检查点阻断疗法是目前非小细胞肺癌的重要治疗方法。然而,两种疗法的联合使用存在争议,很少有研究探讨两种疗法不同时间顺序对治疗结果的影响。
建立荷瘤小鼠模型,将小鼠分为四组,包括抗血管生成-免疫检查点阻断(AA-ICB)顺序组、免疫检查点阻断-抗血管生成(ICB-AA)顺序组、同步组和对照组。采用免疫组织化学评估肿瘤微血管和PD-L1表达。使用流式细胞术评估选定的免疫细胞群体。通过荟萃分析和临床信息阐明给药顺序的临床效果。
我们发现抗PD-L1治疗后再进行抗VEGFR2治疗对肿瘤生长的抑制作用最佳。抗血管生成疗法和免疫检查点阻断疗法的不同顺序导致肿瘤微环境中肿瘤微血管和免疫细胞群体的比例不同。我们进一步发现,在抗VEGFR之前给予抗PD-L1可使肿瘤血管更正常化,增加CD8T细胞浸润,并减少肿瘤微环境中的免疫抑制细胞。随后的再移植实验证实了这种治疗策略的长期益处。荟萃分析强化了抗血管生成治疗前进行免疫治疗或联合治疗在晚期非小细胞肺癌中具有更好的治疗效果。
我们的研究表明,免疫检查点治疗后进行抗血管生成治疗的疗效优于同步治疗,而抗血管生成治疗后进行免疫治疗并未比单独的单一疗法带来更显著的临床益处。