• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于药物的评分在接受一线免疫治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中的预测能力。

Predictive ability of a drug-based score in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line immunotherapy.

机构信息

Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Struttura Complessa di Oncologia Medica e Traslazionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jun;150:224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.041. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.041
PMID:33934059
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated the cumulative poor prognostic role of concomitant medications on the clinical outcome of patients with advanced cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, creating and validating a drug-based prognostic score to be calculated before immunotherapy initiation in patients with advanced solid tumours. This 'drug score' was calculated assigning score 1 for each between proton-pump inhibitor and antibiotic administration until a month before cancer therapy initiation and score 2 in case of corticosteroid intake. The good risk group included patients with score 0, intermediate risk with score 1-2 and poor risk with score 3-4.

METHODS

Aiming at validating the prognostic and putative predictive ability depending on the anticancer therapy, we performed the present comparative analysis in two cohorts of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), respectively, receiving first-line pembrolizumab or chemotherapy through a random case-control matching and through a pooled multivariable analysis including the interaction between the computed score and the therapeutic modality (pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy).

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty and 595 patients were included in the pembrolizumab and chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. After the case-control random matching, 589 patients from the pembrolizumab cohort and 589 from the chemotherapy cohort were paired, with no statistically significant differences between the characteristics of the matched subjects. Among the pembrolizumab-treated group, good, intermediate and poor risk evaluable patients achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 50.0%, 37.7% and 23.4%, respectively, (p < 0.0001), whereas among the chemotherapy-treated group, patients achieved an ORR of 37.0%, 40.0% and 32.4%, respectively (p = 0.4346). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of good, intermediate and poor risk groups was 13.9 months, 6.3 months and 2.8 months, respectively, within the pembrolizumab cohort (p < 0.0001), and 6.2 months, 6.2 months and 4.3 months, respectively, within the chemotherapy cohort (p = 0.0280). Among the pembrolizumab-treated patients, the median overall survival (OS) for good, intermediate and poor risk patients was 31.4 months, 14.5 months and 5.8 months, respectively, (p < 0.0001), whereas among the chemotherapy-treated patients, it was 18.3 months, 16.8 months and 10.6 months, respectively (p = 0.0003). A similar trend was reported considering the two entire populations. At the pooled analysis, the interaction term between the score and the therapeutic modality was statistically significant with respect to ORR (p = 0.0052), PFS (p = 0.0003) and OS (p < 0.0001), confirming the significantly different effect of the score within the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our 'drug score' showed a predictive ability with respect to ORR in the immunotherapy cohort only, suggesting it might be a useful tool for identifying patients unlikely to benefit from first-line single-agent pembrolizumab. In addition, the prognostic stratification in terms of PFS and OS was significantly more pronounced among the pembrolizumab-treated patients.

摘要

背景

我们之前证明了在接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期癌症患者中,同时使用药物对临床结局的累积不良预后作用,并创建和验证了一种基于药物的预后评分,以便在开始晚期实体瘤的免疫治疗前计算。该“药物评分”通过在癌症治疗前一个月内为质子泵抑制剂和抗生素的使用分配 1 分,为皮质类固醇的使用分配 2 分来计算。风险低的患者组得分为 0,风险中为 1-2,风险高为 3-4。

方法

为了验证根据抗癌治疗的预后和潜在预测能力,我们在分别接受一线 pembrolizumab 或化疗的两个晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)队列中进行了本项比较分析,通过随机病例对照匹配和包括计算评分与治疗方式之间的相互作用的多变量分析(pembrolizumab 与化疗)进行了汇总分析。

结果

pembrolizumab 队列和化疗队列分别纳入了 955 例和 595 例患者。在病例对照随机匹配后,pembrolizumab 队列中纳入了 589 例患者,化疗队列中纳入了 589 例患者,匹配患者的特征无统计学差异。在接受 pembrolizumab 治疗的患者中,风险低、中、高的可评估患者的客观缓解率(ORR)分别为 50.0%、37.7%和 23.4%(p<0.0001),而在接受化疗治疗的患者中,ORR 分别为 37.0%、40.0%和 32.4%(p=0.4346)。在 pembrolizumab 队列中,风险低、中、高的患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 13.9 个月、6.3 个月和 2.8 个月(p<0.0001),在化疗队列中,PFS 分别为 6.2 个月、6.2 个月和 4.3 个月(p=0.0280)。在接受 pembrolizumab 治疗的患者中,风险低、中、高的患者的中位总生存期(OS)分别为 31.4 个月、14.5 个月和 5.8 个月(p<0.0001),而在接受化疗治疗的患者中,OS 分别为 18.3 个月、16.8 个月和 10.6 个月(p=0.0003)。在考虑两个整体队列时,也报告了类似的趋势。在汇总分析中,评分与治疗方式之间的交互项在 ORR(p=0.0052)、PFS(p=0.0003)和 OS(p<0.0001)方面具有统计学意义,证实了评分在两个队列中的显著不同效果。

结论

我们的“药物评分”在免疫治疗队列中显示出了对 ORR 的预测能力,这表明它可能是一种有用的工具,可用于识别不太可能从一线单药 pembrolizumab 中获益的患者。此外,在接受 pembrolizumab 治疗的患者中,PFS 和 OS 的预后分层更为显著。

相似文献

1
Predictive ability of a drug-based score in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line immunotherapy.基于药物的评分在接受一线免疫治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中的预测能力。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jun;150:224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.041. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Differential influence of antibiotic therapy and other medications on oncological outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus cytotoxic chemotherapy.一线帕博利珠单抗与细胞毒化疗治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中,抗生素治疗和其他药物对肿瘤学结局的影响差异。
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Apr;9(4). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002421.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel vs Docetaxel Alone in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The PROLUNG Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.帕博利珠单抗联合多西他赛对比多西他赛单药用于既往治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性:PROLUNG 期 2 随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;6(6):856-864. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0409.
4
Baseline total metabolic tumour volume on 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography as a promising biomarker in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab.在接受一线帕博利珠单抗治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中,基于2-脱氧-2-[18F]氟-D-葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描的基线总代谢肿瘤体积作为一种有前景的生物标志物。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jun;150:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
5
The effects of antibiotics on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer differ based on PD-L1 expression.抗生素对非小细胞肺癌患者免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响因程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)表达情况而异。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 May;149:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.040. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Smoking status during first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy in NSCLC patients: A case-control matched analysis from a large multicenter study.一线免疫治疗和化疗期间非小细胞肺癌患者的吸烟状况:一项来自大型多中心研究的病例对照匹配分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Mar;12(6):880-889. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13852. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
7
Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score predicts survival among patients with high PD-L1 expression administered first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.预处理格拉斯哥预后评分预测 PD-L1 高表达患者接受一线帕博利珠单抗单药治疗非小细胞肺癌的生存情况。
Cancer Med. 2021 Oct;10(20):6971-6984. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4220. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
8
Association Between First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibition and Survival for Medicare-Insured Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.一线免疫检查点抑制剂与医疗保险覆盖的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111113. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11113.
9
Propensity score-weighted analysis of chemotherapy after PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (WJOG10217L).非小细胞肺癌患者 PD-1 抑制剂治疗后与单纯化疗相比的倾向性评分加权分析(WJOG10217L)。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000350.
10
Effect of concomitant medications with immune-modulatory properties on the outcomes of patients with advanced cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: development and validation of a novel prognostic index.免疫调节性质的伴随药物对接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期癌症患者结局的影响:新型预后指数的建立和验证。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;142:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.033. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors or cardiovascular medication on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.质子泵抑制剂或心血管药物的联合使用对接受纳武单抗治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者生存结局的影响。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2025 Aug 2;42(5):43. doi: 10.1007/s10585-025-10347-0.
2
The effect of concomitant drugs on oncological outcomes in patients treated with immunotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review.联合用药对接受免疫治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌患者肿瘤学结局的影响:一项叙述性综述
Oncol Res. 2025 Mar 19;33(4):741-757. doi: 10.32604/or.2024.057278. eCollection 2025.
3
Concomitant medications in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving enfortumab vedotin: real-world data from the ARON-2 study.
接受恩杂鲁胺治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌患者的合并用药:来自ARON-2研究的真实世界数据。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2025 Feb 20;42(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s10585-025-10335-4.
4
Associations of concomitant medications with immune-related adverse events and survival in advanced cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis.联合用药与免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期癌症的免疫相关不良事件和生存的相关性:一项全面的泛癌分析。
J Immunother Cancer. 2024 Mar 7;12(3):e008806. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-008806.
5
PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.PPI 治疗对接受 PD-L1 抑制剂治疗的晚期 SCLC 患者的临床结局有负面影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02754-4.
6
Use of concomitant proton pump inhibitors, statins or metformin in patients treated with pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: data from the ARON-2 retrospective study.在接受帕博利珠单抗治疗转移性尿路上皮癌的患者中同时使用质子泵抑制剂、他汀类药物或二甲双胍:来自 ARON-2 回顾性研究的数据。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023 Nov;72(11):3665-3682. doi: 10.1007/s00262-023-03518-z. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
The Role of Immunotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Elderly Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.免疫疗法在老年晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 15;15(8):2319. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082319.
8
Prognostic Model of Baseline Medications plus Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor plus Platinum Doublet: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂联合铂类双药化疗时基线用药加中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的预后模型:一项多中心回顾性研究
J Cancer. 2023 Mar 11;14(5):676-688. doi: 10.7150/jca.80517. eCollection 2023.
9
Immunotherapy in Elderly Patients Affected by Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review.老年非小细胞肺癌患者的免疫治疗:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 24;12(5):1833. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051833.
10
Drug-drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors in cancer patients: an underrecognized cause of treatment failure.癌症患者中质子泵抑制剂的药物相互作用:治疗失败的一个被低估的原因。
ESMO Open. 2023 Feb;8(1):100880. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100880. Epub 2023 Feb 8.