• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务的时间可预测性是否会影响任务选择?

Does temporal predictability of tasks influence task choice?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1066-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01297-1. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01297-1
PMID:32067103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8049906/
Abstract

Task performance improves when the required tasks are predicted by the preceding time intervals, suggesting that participants form time-based task expectancies. In the present study, we pursued the question whether temporal predictability of tasks can also influence task choice. For this purpose, we conducted three experiments using a hybrid task-switching paradigm (with two tasks) combining forced-choice and free-choice trials. Each trial was preceded by either a short (500 ms) or a long (1500 ms) foreperiod. In forced-choice trials, the instructed task was predicted by the length of the foreperiod (Exp. 1A and 1B: 100% foreperiod-task contingencies; Exp. 2: 80% foreperiod-task contingencies). In the remaining trials, participants were free to choose which task to perform. In all three experiments, we found that participants' task choice was influenced by the foreperiod-task contingencies implemented in forced-choice trials. Specifically, participants were overall biased to choose tasks compatible with these contingencies; these compatible choice rates were larger for the short compared to the long foreperiod. Our findings suggest that learned time-based task expectancies influence subjects' voluntary task choice and that an initially present task bias toward the "short" task is not always overcome at the long foreperiod. We discuss potential underlying mechanisms against the background of voluntary task switching and interval timing.

摘要

当所需任务可以被前一时间间隔预测时,任务表现会提高,这表明参与者形成了基于时间的任务期望。在本研究中,我们探讨了任务的时间可预测性是否也会影响任务选择。为此,我们使用了一种结合了强制选择和自由选择试验的混合任务转换范式(有两个任务)进行了三项实验。每个试验之前都有一个短(500 毫秒)或长(1500 毫秒)的预备期。在强制选择试验中,预备期的长度预测了被指示的任务(实验 1A 和 1B:100%预备期-任务关联;实验 2:80%预备期-任务关联)。在其余的试验中,参与者可以自由选择要执行的任务。在所有三个实验中,我们发现参与者的任务选择受到了强制选择试验中预备期-任务关联的影响。具体来说,参与者总体上倾向于选择与这些关联一致的任务;与长预备期相比,短预备期的这种兼容选择率更大。我们的发现表明,基于时间的习得任务期望会影响受试者的自愿任务选择,并且在长预备期时,对“短”任务的初始任务偏向并不总是被克服。我们在自愿任务转换和间隔计时的背景下讨论了潜在的潜在机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf0/8049906/ed9258182332/426_2020_1297_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf0/8049906/193acc14ca0c/426_2020_1297_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf0/8049906/c2949e90a8fe/426_2020_1297_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf0/8049906/ed9258182332/426_2020_1297_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf0/8049906/193acc14ca0c/426_2020_1297_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf0/8049906/c2949e90a8fe/426_2020_1297_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf0/8049906/ed9258182332/426_2020_1297_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does temporal predictability of tasks influence task choice?任务的时间可预测性是否会影响任务选择?
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1066-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01297-1. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
The influence of reward and loss outcomes after free- and forced-tasks on voluntary task choice.自由任务和强制任务后的奖励和损失结果对自愿任务选择的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):2059-2079. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02009-9. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Keep flexible-Keep switching? Boundary conditions of the influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.保持灵活性——持续切换?强制任务切换对自愿任务切换影响的边界条件。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Sep;48(9):1249-1262. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001104. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Task predictability influences the variable foreperiod effect: evidence of task-specific temporal preparation.任务可预测性影响可变前周期效应:特定任务时间准备的证据。
Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):230-7. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0550-z.
5
Linking task selection to task performance: Internal and predictable external processing constraints jointly influence voluntary task switching behavior.将任务选择与任务表现联系起来:内部和可预测的外部处理约束共同影响自愿任务转换行为。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Dec;45(12):1529-1548. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000690. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Only time will tell the future: Anticipatory saccades reveal the temporal dynamics of time-based location and task expectancy.只有时间才能揭示未来:预期性扫视揭示了基于时间的位置和任务预期的时间动态。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct;46(10):1183-1200. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000850. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.时间辨别和反应时间任务中前周期效应的分离模式。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 May;64(5):1009-20. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.532225. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
8
Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.探索自愿任务切换中的重复偏差。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):78-91. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0911-5. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
9
A New Foreperiod Effect on Intertrial Phase Coherence. Part I: Existence and Behavioral Relevance.一种对试验间期相位相干性的新前周期效应。第一部分:存在性及行为相关性。
Neural Comput. 2018 Sep;30(9):2348-2383. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01109. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Keep flexible - Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.保持灵活性——不断切换!强制任务切换对自愿任务切换的影响。
Cognition. 2017 May;162:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of reward and loss outcomes after free- and forced-tasks on voluntary task choice.自由任务和强制任务后的奖励和损失结果对自愿任务选择的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):2059-2079. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02009-9. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Reactive and proactive control processes in voluntary task choice.自愿任务选择中的反应性和主动性控制过程。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):417-429. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01470-y. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
The Role of Effector-Specific Task Representations in Voluntary Task Switching.效应器特定任务表征在自愿任务切换中的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating Models of Interval Timing and Reinforcement Learning.整合区间定时和强化学习模型。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Oct;22(10):911-922. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.004.
2
State-change decisions and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex: the importance of time.状态改变决策与背内侧前额叶皮层:时间的重要性。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Aug;22:152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.06.017.
3
When specific action biases meet nonspecific preparation: Event repetition modulates the variable-foreperiod effect.当特定动作偏差遇到非特定准备时:事件重复调节可变前周期效应。
J Cogn. 2023 Jan 13;6(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.255. eCollection 2023.
4
Investigating time-based expectancy beyond binary timing scenarios: evidence from a paradigm employing three predictive pre-target intervals.研究超越二元定时情景的基于时间的预期:来自采用三个预测前目标间隔的范式的证据。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):2007-2020. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01606-2. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Sep;44(9):1313-1323. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000561. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
4
Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.权衡转换代价和刺激可得性收益:在可预测的动态多重任务环境中对自愿任务转换行为的研究。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):699-715. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0802-z.
5
Time-based expectancy in temporally structured task switching.时间结构化任务切换中的基于时间的期望
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jun;44(6):856-870. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000494. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
The dynamic balance between cognitive flexibility and stability: the influence of local changes in reward expectation and global task context on voluntary switch rate.认知灵活性与稳定性之间的动态平衡:奖励期望的局部变化和全局任务背景对自愿转换率的影响。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):65-77. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0922-2. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments.基于时间的任务预期在不同计时环境中的转移。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):230-243. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0895-1. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
8
Time-based expectations entail preparatory motor activity.基于时间的预期需要准备性的运动活动。
Cortex. 2017 Jul;92:261-270. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 May 4.
9
Keep flexible - Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching.保持灵活性——不断切换!强制任务切换对自愿任务切换的影响。
Cognition. 2017 May;162:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
10
The Role of Dopamine in Temporal Uncertainty.多巴胺在时间不确定性中的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;28(1):96-110. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00880. Epub 2015 Sep 24.