Suppr超能文献

工作记忆任务预期期间前额叶皮层的激活有助于区分双相抑郁和单相抑郁。

Prefrontal cortical activation during working memory task anticipation contributes to discrimination between bipolar and unipolar depression.

作者信息

Manelis Anna, Iyengar Satish, Swartz Holly A, Phillips Mary L

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Department of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 May;45(6):956-963. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0638-7. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

Abstract

Distinguishing bipolar disorder (BD) from major depressive disorder (MDD) is clinically challenging, especially during depressive episodes. While both groups are characterized by aberrant working memory and anticipatory processing, the role of these processes in discriminating BD from MDD remains unexplored. In this study, we examine how brain activation corresponding to anticipation of and performance on easy vs. difficult working memory tasks with emotional stimuli contributes to discrimination among BD, MDD, and healthy controls (HC). Depressed individuals with BD (n = 18), MDD (n = 23), and HC (n = 23) were scanned while performing a working memory task in which they had to first anticipate performance on 1-back (easy) or 2-back (difficult) tasks with happy, fearful, or neutral faces, and then, perform the task. Anticipation-related and task-related brain activation was measured in the whole brain using functional magnetic resonance imagining. We used an elastic-net regression for variable selection, and a random forest classifier for BD vs. MDD classification. The former selected the activation differences (1-back minus 2-back) in the lateral and medial prefrontal cortices (PFC) during task anticipation and performance on the working memory tasks with fearful and neutral faces as variables relevant for BD vs. MDD classification. BD vs. MDD were classified with 70.7% accuracy (p < 0.01) based on the neuroimaging measures alone, with 80.5% accuracy (p = 0.001) based on clinical measures alone, and with 85.4% accuracy (p < 0.001) based on clinical and neuroimaging measures together. These findings suggest that PFC activation during working memory task anticipation and performance may be an important biological marker distinguishing BD from MDD.

摘要

区分双相情感障碍(BD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)在临床上具有挑战性,尤其是在抑郁发作期间。虽然这两组患者均具有异常的工作记忆和预期加工特征,但这些过程在区分BD和MDD中的作用仍未得到探索。在本研究中,我们考察了与带有情绪刺激的简单与困难工作记忆任务的预期及执行相对应的大脑激活如何有助于区分BD、MDD和健康对照(HC)。患有BD(n = 18)、MDD(n = 23)和HC(n = 23)的抑郁个体在执行一项工作记忆任务时接受扫描,在该任务中,他们必须首先预期对带有开心、恐惧或中性面孔的1-back(简单)或2-back(困难)任务的执行情况,然后执行该任务。使用功能磁共振成像在全脑范围内测量与预期相关和与任务相关的大脑激活。我们使用弹性网络回归进行变量选择,并使用随机森林分类器进行BD与MDD的分类。前者选择了在带有恐惧和中性面孔的工作记忆任务的预期和执行过程中,外侧和内侧前额叶皮质(PFC)的激活差异(1-back减去2-back)作为与BD和MDD分类相关的变量。仅基于神经影像学测量,BD与MDD分类的准确率为70.7%(p < 0.01),仅基于临床测量的准确率为80.5%(p = 0.001),基于临床和神经影像学测量的准确率为85.4%(p < 0.001)。这些发现表明,工作记忆任务预期和执行过程中的PFC激活可能是区分BD和MDD的重要生物学标志物。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Machine Learning on Early Diagnosis of Depression.机器学习在抑郁症早期诊断中的应用
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Aug;19(8):597-605. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0075. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

3
fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI.fMRIPrep:用于功能磁共振成像的强大预处理流水线。
Nat Methods. 2019 Jan;16(1):111-116. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验